BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489944)

  • 1. The perfect pelvic pouch--what makes the difference?
    Lewis WG; Miller AS; Williamson ME; Sagar PM; Holdsworth PJ; Axon AT; Johnston D
    Gut; 1995 Oct; 37(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 7489944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preservation of complete anal sphincteric proprioception in restorative proctocolectomy: the inhibitory reflex and fine control of continence need not be impaired.
    Lewis WG; Williamson ME; Miller AS; Sagar PM; Holdsworth PJ; Johnston D
    Gut; 1995 Jun; 36(6):902-6. PubMed ID: 7615281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: does it correlate with nocturnal continence?
    Saigusa N; Belin BM; Choi HJ; Gervaz P; Efron JE; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Wexner SD
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Feb; 46(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 12576889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Current concepts.
    Goes R; Beart RW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1995 Sep; 38(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 7656753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.
    Farouk R; Duthie GS; Bartolo DC
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jul; 81(7):1065-8. PubMed ID: 7922067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ano-neorectal function using manometry on patients after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in children.
    Tomita R; Ikeda T; Fujisaki S; Sugito K; Sakurai K; Koshinaga T; Shibata M
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2012; 59(113):112-5. PubMed ID: 21940360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and physiological evaluation of anorectal eversion during restorative proctocolectomy.
    Williamson ME; Lewis WG; Miller AS; Sagar PM; Holdsworth PJ; Johnston D
    Br J Surg; 1995 Oct; 82(10):1391-4. PubMed ID: 7489175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy.
    Hallgren TA; Fasth SB; Oresland TO; Hultén LA
    Eur J Surg; 1995 Dec; 161(12):915-21. PubMed ID: 8775636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome.
    Becker JM; LaMorte W; St Marie G; Ferzoco S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Jun; 40(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 9194458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sphincter defects are not associated with long-term incontinence following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Gearhart SL; Hull TL; Schroeder T; Church J; Floruta C
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jul; 48(7):1410-5. PubMed ID: 15793633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.
    Tuckson WB; McNamara MJ; Fazio VW; Lavery IC; Oakley JR
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1991 Dec; 83(12):1089-92. PubMed ID: 1813639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.
    Hallgren T; Fasth S; Delbro DS; Nordgren S; Oresland T; Hultén L
    Dig Dis Sci; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2612-8. PubMed ID: 7995187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restorative proctocolectomy with end to end pouch-anal anastomosis in patients over the age of fifty.
    Lewis WG; Sagar PM; Holdsworth PJ; Axon AT; Johnston D
    Gut; 1993 Jul; 34(7):948-52. PubMed ID: 8344583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between laboratory findings and clinical outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: serial studies in 20 patients with end-to-end pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Sagar PM; Holdsworth PJ; Johnston D
    Br J Surg; 1991 Jan; 78(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 1998869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physiologic evaluation and surgical management of failed ileoanal pouch.
    Klas J; Myers GA; Starling JR; Harms BA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Jul; 41(7):854-61. PubMed ID: 9678370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of anorectal eversion during restorative proctocolectomy on anal sphincter function.
    Lewis WG; Holdsworth PJ; Sagar PM; Holmfield JH; Johnston D
    Br J Surg; 1993 Jan; 80(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 8428269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?
    Miller AS; Lewis WG; Williamson ME; Sagar PM; Holdsworth PJ; Johnston D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1996 May; 39(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 8620796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?
    Schluender SJ; Mei L; Yang H; Fleshner PR
    Am Surg; 2006 Oct; 72(10):912-6. PubMed ID: 17058734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: the manometric assessment of pouch continence and its reservoir function.
    Pescatori M
    World J Surg; 1992; 16(5):872-9. PubMed ID: 1462622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Possibilities in the preservation and restoration of anal continence].
    Lestár B; Asztalos I; László S; Polányi C; Hornok L; Ritter L; Rózsa I
    Magy Seb; 2001 Jun; 54(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 11432169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.