These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7490184)

  • 1. Guidelines for the assessment of new diagnostic tests.
    van der Schouw YT; Verbeek AL; Ruijs SH
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Jun; 30(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 7490184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
    Proeve M
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker.
    Moons KG; de Groot JA; Linnet K; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    Clin Chem; 2012 Oct; 58(10):1408-17. PubMed ID: 22952348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence-value-accuracy plots: a new method for comparing diagnostic tests based on misclassification costs.
    Remaley AT; Sampson ML; DeLeo JM; Remaley NA; Farsi BD; Zweig MH
    Clin Chem; 1999 Jul; 45(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 10388467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal test strategy in the case of two tests and one disease.
    Ament A; Hasman A
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1993 Nov; 33(3-4):179-97. PubMed ID: 8307651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
    Reid MC; Lachs MS; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):645-51. PubMed ID: 7637146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery: a systematic review and decision-analytical model.
    Burch J; Hinde S; Palmer S; Beyer F; Minton J; Marson A; Wieshmann U; Woolacott N; Soares M
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(34):1-157, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 22985954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods of selection of cutoff points in the development and interpretation of diagnostic tests].
    Strnad L; Tosner J
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1991; 34(5):657-70. PubMed ID: 1842316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Shapiro DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions.
    Leeflang MM; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Zwinderman AH
    Clin Chem; 2008 Apr; 54(4):729-37. PubMed ID: 18258670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability theory in the use of diagnostic tests. An introduction to critical study of the literature.
    Sox HC
    Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jan; 104(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 3079637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ROC curves and the areas under them for dichotomized tests: empirical findings for logistically and normally distributed diagnostic test results.
    van der Schouw YT; Straatman H; Verbeek AL
    Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 7808212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dilution testing using rapid diagnostic tests in a HIV diagnostic algorithm: a novel alternative for confirmation testing in resource limited settings.
    Shanks L; Siddiqui MR; Abebe A; Piriou E; Pearce N; Ariti C; Masiga J; Muluneh L; Wazome J; Ritmeijer K; Klarkowski D
    Virol J; 2015 May; 12():75. PubMed ID: 25972188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis in surgical research and decision making.
    Søreide K; Kørner H; Søreide JA
    Ann Surg; 2011 Jan; 253(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21294285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validation of interviews for estimating morbidity.
    Kalter H
    Health Policy Plan; 1992 Mar; 7(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 10117988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of Bayes theorem in the interpretation of subjective diagnostic findings: what can we learn from agreement studies?
    Sadatsafavi M; Moayyeri A; Bahrami H; Soltani A
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 17873264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.