These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7490576)

  • 41. How context features modulate the involvement of the working memory system during discourse comprehension.
    Yang X; Zhang X; Yang Y; Lin N
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():36-44. PubMed ID: 29339077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preservation of memory-based automaticity in reading for older adults.
    Rawson KA; Touron DR
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):809-23. PubMed ID: 26302027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Working memory and inferences: evidence from eye fixations during reading.
    Calvo MG
    Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):365-81. PubMed ID: 11594358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Who do you refer to? How young students with mild intellectual disability confront anaphoric ambiguities in texts and sentences.
    Tavares G; Fajardo I; Ávila V; Salmerón L; Ferrer A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015 Mar; 38():108-24. PubMed ID: 25556895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Inconsistency effects in source memory and compensatory schema-consistent guessing.
    Küppers V; Bayen UJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2042-59. PubMed ID: 24628718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The bizarreness effect: dissociation between item and source memory.
    Macklin CB; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 2005 Oct; 13(7):682-9. PubMed ID: 16191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of reading performance tests concerning difficulty of sentences and paragraphs and their reliability.
    Brussee T; van Nispen RM; Klerkx EM; Knol DL; van Rens GH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 May; 35(3):324-35. PubMed ID: 25913875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interruption-similarity effects during discourse processing.
    Ledoux K; Gordon PC
    Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):789-803. PubMed ID: 16938692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reading homophone puns: Evidence from eye tracking.
    Jared D; Bainbridge S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 28252994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accessing Real-Life Episodic Information from Minutes versus Hours Earlier Modulates Hippocampal and High-Order Cortical Dynamics.
    Chen J; Honey CJ; Simony E; Arcaro MJ; Norman KA; Hasson U
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Aug; 26(8):3428-3441. PubMed ID: 26240179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision?
    Fine EM; Hazel CA; Petre KL; Rubin GS
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 76(11):764-9. PubMed ID: 10566861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hemispheric differences in the activation of perceptual information during sentence comprehension.
    Lincoln AE; Long DL; Baynes K
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 16893556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.
    Altpeter EK; Marx T; Nguyen NX; Naumann A; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 253(8):1369-75. PubMed ID: 26067392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.
    Guerra E; Knoeferle P
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):535-52. PubMed ID: 25215930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Source credibility and the processing of refutation texts.
    Van Boekel M; Lassonde KA; O'Brien EJ; Kendeou P
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):168-181. PubMed ID: 27585919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Memory for word locations in reading.
    Fischer MH
    Memory; 1999 Jan; 7(1):79-116. PubMed ID: 10645374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
    Liversedge SP; Rayner K; White SJ; Vergilino-Perez D; Findlay JM; Kentridge RW
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1013-24. PubMed ID: 15031094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptual and conceptual priming of individual words in coherent texts.
    Nicolas S
    Memory; 1998 Nov; 6(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 10320868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.