These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7490584)

  • 1. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.
    Pratt J; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Dec; 21(6):1343-53. PubMed ID: 7490584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volitional covert orienting to a peripheral cue does not suppress cue-induced inhibition of return.
    Berlucchi G; Chelazzi L; Tassinari G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 12(4):648-63. PubMed ID: 10936917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):532-44. PubMed ID: 20182742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition of return shortens perceived duration of a brief visual event.
    Osugi T; Takeda Y; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 Nov; 128():39-44. PubMed ID: 27665071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The scope of no return: Openness predicts the spatial distribution of Inhibition of Return.
    Wilson KE; Lowe MX; Ruppel J; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):209-17. PubMed ID: 26486642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The spatial distribution of inhibition of return.
    Bennett PJ; Pratt J
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Jan; 12(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 11294232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G
    Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995).
    Tipper SP; Weaver B; Watson FL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Oct; 22(5):1289-93. PubMed ID: 8965063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: implications for memory and visual search.
    Dodd MD; Castel AD; Pratt J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14674638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.
    Danziger S; Kingstone A; Snyder JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1467-75. PubMed ID: 9778832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):620-31. PubMed ID: 19304651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An attentional grasp reflex in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Jun; 33(6):689-701. PubMed ID: 7675161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for an attentional component of inhibition of return in visual search.
    Pierce AM; Crouse MD; Green JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Nov; 54(11):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 28580702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: a reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996).
    Abrams RA; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Oct; 22(5):1294-8. PubMed ID: 8865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.