These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7490595)

  • 41. A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes.
    Streiff MB; Dundes L; Spivak JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 54(4):430-2. PubMed ID: 11297894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire.
    Paganini-Hill A; Hsu G; Chao A; Ross RK
    Epidemiology; 1993 Jul; 4(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 8347749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Predictors of response rates to a long term follow-up mail out survey.
    Koloski NA; Jones M; Eslick G; Talley NJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79179. PubMed ID: 24223902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Response bias: effect on outcomes evaluation by mail surveys after total knee arthroplasty.
    Kim J; Lonner JH; Nelson CL; Lotke PA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 14711940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
    Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys.
    Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Rogers WH; Chang H; Fanjiang G; Safran DG
    Med Care; 2006 Feb; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Applying mail response enhancement techniques to health care surveys: a cost-benefit approach.
    Finlay J; Thistlethwaite PC
    Health Mark Q; 1992; 10(1-2):91-102. PubMed ID: 10124799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys.
    Yarris LM; Fu R; Duby R; Frakes B; Brooks H; Norton RL
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Dec; 47(6):702-9. PubMed ID: 25281169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of timed incentives on subject participation in a study of long-term breast cancer survivors: are there ethnic differences?
    Ashing-Giwa K; Ganz PA
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2000 Nov; 92(11):528-32. PubMed ID: 11152085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians.
    Leung GM; Johnston JM; Saing H; Tin KY; Wong IO; Ho LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 15485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Response rates and non-response bias in a health-related mailed survey].
    Nakai S; Hashimoto S; Murakami Y; Hayashi M; Manabe K; Noda H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1997 Mar; 44(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 9175409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prolonged recruitment efforts in health surveys: effects on response, costs, and potential bias.
    Holle R; Hochadel M; Reitmeir P; Meisinger C; Wichmann HE;
    Epidemiology; 2006 Nov; 17(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 17003684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Some methodological aspects of using postal questionnaires with the elderly.
    Victor CR
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 1988 Jun; 7(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 3415396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Surveying physicians: do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?
    Field TS; Cadoret CA; Brown ML; Ford M; Greene SM; Hill D; Hornbrook MC; Meenan RT; White MJ; Zapka JM
    Med Care; 2002 Jul; 40(7):596-605. PubMed ID: 12142775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Surveying adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization: mail and phone follow-up--what works at what cost?
    Richards J; Wiese C; Katon W; Rockhill C; McCarty C; Grossman D; McCauley E; Richardson LP
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2010; 23(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 20616296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Technique bias in measuring acts of altruism. The case of voluntary blood donation.
    Lightman ES
    Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(18):1627-33. PubMed ID: 7146939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
    Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I; Cooper R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000008. PubMed ID: 17443629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.