These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7490668)

  • 21. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials.
    Francisconi LF; Honório HM; Rios D; Magalhães AC; Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18435196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness.
    Hengtrakool C; Pearson GJ; Wilson M
    J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):588-97. PubMed ID: 16540228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 17207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of tooth brushing and thermal cycling on a surface change of ceromers finished with different methods.
    Cho LR; Yi YJ; Heo SJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Sep; 29(9):816-22. PubMed ID: 12366534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Elnafar AA; Alam MK; Hasan R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 25143559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro interactions between lactic acid solution and art glass-ionomer cements.
    Wang L; Cefaly DF; Dos Santos JL; Dos Santos JR; Lauris JR; Mondelli RF; Atta MT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 19668984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repair of glass ionomer cements--methods for conditioning the surface of the cement to achieve bonding.
    Jamaluddin A; Pearson GJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Nov; 21(6):649-53. PubMed ID: 7830200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of pH variations in a cycling model on the properties of restorative materials.
    Silva KG; Pedrini D; Delbem AC; Cannon M
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 17695604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Yamada R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12518948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of etching time on surface morphology and adhesion of a posterior resin to glass-ionomer cement.
    Joynt RB; Williams D; Davis EL; Wieczkowski G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 2646444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Lye KW; Sau CW
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 9610323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
    Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of N-vinylpyrrolidone (NVP) containing polyelectrolytes on surface properties of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GIC).
    Moshaverinia A; Roohpour N; Ansari S; Moshaverinia M; Schricker S; Darr JA; Rehman IU
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1240-7. PubMed ID: 19556000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vivo changes in roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer materials.
    Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 9758976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.