These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7491482)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside.
    Youngner JS
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 9424047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct. HHS is still looking for a definition.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1735. PubMed ID: 8650565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advisory committee urges changes at OSI.
    Gibbons A
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5036):1287-8. PubMed ID: 1962186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct. Federal panel recommends universities play bigger role.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5197):449. PubMed ID: 7824941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study proposed on integrity of published data.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Oct; 371(6500):733. PubMed ID: 7935825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baltimore case--in brief.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jul; 253(5015):24-5. PubMed ID: 1648263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commission proposes new definition of misconduct.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Sep; 269(5232):1811. PubMed ID: 7569910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
    Chubin DE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ORI and misconduct investigations.
    Bivens LW
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
    Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct. Shalala takes watchdog office out of the hunt.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Oct; 286(5441):883. PubMed ID: 10577232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.