These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7492423)
1. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Pringle M; Ward P; Chilvers C Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):537-41. PubMed ID: 7492423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland. Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Taylor MW; Watt AH Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems. Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them. de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The completeness and accuracy of patient record transfer between practices. Sullivan F; Wilson P Health Bull (Edinb); 1997 Jan; 55(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 9090174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? Scobie S; Basnett I; McCartney P J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 8639350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers. de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wood O; Hague N; Valentin T; Van Vlymen J Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Creating a general practice national minimum data set: present possibility or future plan? Tilyard MW; Munro N; Walker SA; Dovey SM N Z Med J; 1998 Aug; 111(1072):317-8, 320. PubMed ID: 9765630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing. Rogers JE; Wroe CJ; Roberts A; Swallow A; Stables D; Cantrill JA; Rector AL Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Nov; 53(496):838-44. PubMed ID: 14702902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audit of preventive activities in 16 inner London practices using a validated measure of patient population, the 'active patient' denominator. Healthy Eastenders Project. Robson J; Falshaw M Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Sep; 45(398):463-6. PubMed ID: 7546868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of physicians' accuracy in recording with quality of care in cardiovascular medicine. Giorda CB; Guida P; Avogaro A; Cortese C; Mureddu GF; Corsini A; Comaschi MA; Manzato E; Volpe M; Zito GB; Medea G; Ventriglia G; Titta G; Riccardi G; Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2009 Dec; 16(6):722-8. PubMed ID: 19770664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic. Szeto HC; Coleman RK; Gholami P; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 8(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11814171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record. Silfen E Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity and prescribing patterns for the middle-aged population of Scotland. Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Taylor RJ; Watt AH Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Dec; 46(413):707-14. PubMed ID: 8995849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The General Practice Research Network: the capabilities of an electronic patient management system for longitudinal patient data. Sayer GP; McGeechan K; Kemp A; Bhasale A; Horn F; Hendrie L; Swan L; Scahill S Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2003 Sep; 12(6):483-9. PubMed ID: 14513662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic Patient Record data as proxy of GPs' thoughts. De Clercq E; Van Casteren V; Jonckheer P; Burggraeve P; Lafontaine MF Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 141():103-10. PubMed ID: 18953130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying patients with chronic kidney disease from general practice computer records. de Lusignan S; Chan T; Stevens P; O'Donoghue D; Hague N; Dzregah B; Van Vlymen J; Walker M; Hilton S Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 22(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 15814579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health promotion and the use of Gpass in Scotland. Henderson BS; Taylor MW; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Begg A; McEwan SR; Irving M Health Bull (Edinb); 1995 Sep; 53(5):253-9. PubMed ID: 7490195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel method for the assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic codes in general surgery. Gibson N; Bridgman SA Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Jul; 80(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 9771235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Features of medical records in community practices and their association with preventive service delivery. Weyer SM; Konrad N; Esola D; Goodwin MA; Stange KC; Flocke SA Med Care; 2005 Jan; 43(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15626931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]