120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7492727)
41. Ultrasound characterizes equivocal breast lesions.
D'Agincourt L
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):49-59. PubMed ID: 10146686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype.
Duric N; Littrup P; Poulo L; Babkin A; Pevzner R; Holsapple E; Rama O; Glide C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):773-85. PubMed ID: 17388195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Real time ultrasound in routine breast diagnosis].
Huber JC; Fischl F; Kubista E; Reinold E
Ultraschall Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):137-9. PubMed ID: 9417613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Detection of malignant and benign breast lesions with an automated US system: results in 120 cases.
Richter K; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Winzer KJ; Schmitt KJ; Prihoda H; Frohberg HD; Guski H; Gregor P; Blohmer JU; Fobbe F; Döinghaus K; Löhr G; Hamm B
Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):823-30. PubMed ID: 9393543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Stereotactic mammography imaging combined with 3D US imaging for image guided breast biopsy.
Surry KJ; Mills GR; Bevan K; Downey DB; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4348-58. PubMed ID: 18072500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound.
Kotsianos-Hermle D; Hiltawsky KM; Wirth S; Fischer T; Friese K; Reiser M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18468829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The role of enhanced Doppler ultrasound in differentiation of benign vs. malignant scar lesion after breast surgery for malignancy.
Bäz E; Madjar H; Reuss C; Vetter M; Hackelöer B; Holz K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 10976477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Comparison between current and high resolution ultrasound for diagnosis of breast lesions].
Schnarkowski P; Schmidt D; Milz P; Kessler M; Reiser MF
Ultraschall Med; 1996 Aug; 17(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 8999520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Imaging results of multi-modal ultrasound computerized tomography system designed for breast diagnosis.
Opieliński KJ; Pruchnicki P; Gudra T; Podgórski P; Kurcz J; Kraśnicki T; Sąsiadek M; Majewski J
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():83-94. PubMed ID: 25759234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Imaging-guided core biopsies in the breast.
Soo MS
South Med J; 1998 Nov; 91(11):994-1000. PubMed ID: 9824178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Comparative studies of various echomammography techniques].
Teubner J; van Kaick G; Pickenhan L; Schmidt W
Ultraschall Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):109-18. PubMed ID: 9417610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ultrasound-guided optical tomographic imaging of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical results of 19 cases.
Zhu Q; Huang M; Chen N; Zarfos K; Jagjivan B; Kane M; Hedge P; Kurtzman SH
Neoplasia; 2003; 5(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 14670175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic evaluation of sonographically visualized breast lesions by using a new clinical amplitude/velocity reference imaging technique (CARI sonography).
Schütze B; Marx C; Fleck M; Reichenbach J; Kaiser WA
Invest Radiol; 1998 Jun; 33(6):341-7. PubMed ID: 9647446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations.
Chang JM; Cha JH; Park JS; Kim SJ; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1163-70. PubMed ID: 25280476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of microcalcifications in women with dense breasts and hypoechoic focal lesions: comparison of mammography and ultrasound.
Grigoryev M; Thomas A; Plath L; Durmus T; Slowinski T; Diekmann F; Fischer T
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Dec; 35(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 24871694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
