These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7492859)

  • 1. Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.
    Faulkner KG; McClung MR
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 7492859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
    Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
    Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An unexpected change in DXA calibration not detected by routine quality control checks.
    Blake GM; Preston NG; Patel R; Herd RJ; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 10367037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of different dual X-ray absorptiometry brands in a multicenter clinical trial: consequences and limits.
    Slosman DO; Provvedini DM; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD; Sebert JL; De Vernejoul MC; Tsouderos Y; Reginster JY
    J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23547312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control of bone densitometry in a national health survey (NHANES III) using three mobile examination centers.
    Wahner HW; Looker A; Dunn WL; Walters LC; Hauser MF; Novak C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Jun; 9(6):951-60. PubMed ID: 8079669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-calibration, Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position.
    Jankowski LG; Warner S; Gaither K; Lenchik L; Fan B; Lu Y; Shepherd J
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(4):472-483. PubMed ID: 31558404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studies.
    Orwoll ES; Oviatt SK; Biddle JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1993 Jun; 8(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 8328311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
    Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
    Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scanner-induced variability and quality assurance in longitudinal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements.
    Sievänen H; Oja P; Vuori I
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1795-805. PubMed ID: 7891642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.
    Hangartner TN
    Osteoporos Int; 2007 Apr; 18(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 17136486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
    Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
    Trevisan C; Gandolini GG; Sibilla P; Penotti M; Caraceni MP; Ortolani S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Semin Nucl Med; 1997 Jul; 27(3):210-28. PubMed ID: 9224663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suspension criteria for dual energy X ray absorptiometry.
    McLean ID
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):227-9. PubMed ID: 23169815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of room temperature on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Culton NL; Pocock NA
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 Apr; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 12730777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.
    Pearson J; Dequeker J; Henley M; Bright J; Reeve J; Kalender W; Laval-Jeantet AM; Rüegsegger P; Felsenberg D; Adams J
    Osteoporos Int; 1995 May; 5(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 7655178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.