121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7493458)
21. Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates.
Durand G; de Burlet G; Virat M; Nauman BD
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 14678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intra-laboratory study to determine the reproducibility of LLNA:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Chen W; Xing C; Hou F
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 82():26-30. PubMed ID: 27456929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Further development of LLNA:DAE method as stand-alone skin-sensitization testing method and applied for evaluation of relative skin-sensitizing potency between chemicals.
Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Apr; 40(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 25786520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skin sensitization potency and cross-reactivity of p-phenylenediamine and its derivatives evaluated by non-radioactive murine local lymph node assay and guinea-pig maximization test.
Yamano T; Shimizu M
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 19338586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The local lymph node assay: status of validation.
Chamberlain M; Basketter DA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 34(10):999-1002. PubMed ID: 9012775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel.
Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.
Frankild S; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE; Andersen KE
Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 11028857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay.
Dearman RJ; Wright ZM; Basketter DA; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Jun; 44(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 11380546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative testing for the identification of skin-sensitizing potentials of nonionic sugar lipid surfactants.
Garcia C; Ball N; Cagen S; Carrillo JC; Certa H; Eigler D; Esch H; Graham C; Haux C; Kreiling R; Mehling A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 20599457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Information derived from sensitization test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives.
Basketter DA; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17177701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance standard-based validation study for local lymph node assay: 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-flow cytometry method.
Ahn I; Kim TS; Jung ES; Yi JS; Jang WH; Jung KM; Park M; Jung MS; Jeon EY; Yeo KU; Jo JH; Park JE; Kim CY; Park YC; Seong WK; Lee AY; Chun YJ; Jeong TC; Jeung EB; Lim KM; Bae S; Sohn S; Heo Y
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():183-94. PubMed ID: 27318101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Metabolism of benzocaine during percutaneous absorption in the hairless guinea pig: acetylbenzocaine formation and activity.
Kraeling ME; Lipicky RJ; Bronaugh RL
Skin Pharmacol; 1996; 9(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 8737920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Local lymph node assay - validation, conduct and use in practice.
Basketter DA; Evans P; Fielder RJ; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002 May; 40(5):593-8. PubMed ID: 11955664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating the sensitization potential of surfactants: integrating data from the local lymph node assay, guinea pig maximization test, and in vitro methods in a weight-of-evidence approach.
Ball N; Cagen S; Carrillo JC; Certa H; Eigler D; Emter R; Faulhammer F; Garcia C; Graham C; Haux C; Kolle SN; Kreiling R; Natsch A; Mehling A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Aug; 60(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 21645576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: experience with guinea pig assays.
Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 30(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20583317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
