These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7495433)

  • 1. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Results of recording frequency-specific acoustically evoked potentials with masked stimuli].
    Schönweiler R; Tolloczko R; Ptok M
    HNO; 1995 Jun; 43(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 7642399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative diagnostic test for active Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops using high-pass noise masked responses: the complex amplitude ratio.
    Don M; Kwong B; Tanaka C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 17664867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.
    Wood MH; Seitz MR; Jacobson JT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 528293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Frequency specificity of acoustic evoked potentials of early and intermediate latency with high-pass noise masking].
    Anft D; Bartsch E; Scholz G; Mrowinski D
    HNO; 1998 May; 46(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 9647923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials using a tone pip auditory stimulus.
    Papathanasiou ES; Zamba-Papanicolaou E; Pantziaris M; Kleopas K; Kyriakides T; Papacostas S; Pattichis C; Iliopoulos I; Piperidou C
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 15125057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brainstem wave V latencies to tone pip stimuli.
    Weber BA; Folsom RC
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):182-4. PubMed ID: 856779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Amplitude modulation following response (AMFR)--a method for objective frequency specific audiologic diagnosis].
    Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Lottmann JK
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8851115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
    Dum N; von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of auditory brain stem response sources along the basilar membrane to low-frequency filtered clicks.
    Kinarti R; Sohmer H
    Isr J Med Sci; 1982 Jan; 18(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 7068347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Wegner O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An optimal electrode position for recording auditory evoked brain stem potentials within the scope of pediatric audiology].
    Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Smukalla K; von Specht H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9577818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Li X; Jeng FC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR).
    Tlumak AI; Rubinstein E; Durrant JD
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):692-710. PubMed ID: 17978952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.