158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7495588)
1. The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experience.
Van Nooten GJ; Caes FL; François KJ; Taeymans Y; Primo G; Wellens F; Leclerq JL; Deuvaert FE
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995; 9(8):441-6; discussion 446-7. PubMed ID: 7495588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tricuspid valve replacement: postoperative and long-term results.
Van Nooten GJ; Caes F; Taeymans Y; Van Belleghem Y; François K; De Bacquer D; Deuvaert FE; Wellens F; Primo G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep; 110(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 7564433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.
Scully HE; Armstrong CS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 109(6):1035-41. PubMed ID: 7776666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tricuspid valve replacement subsequent to previous open heart surgery.
Hornick P; Harris PA; Taylor KM
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 8834720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term results of porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position.
Jegaden O; Perinetti M; Barthelet M; Vedrinne C; Delahaye F; Montagna P; Mikaeloff PH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(5):256-60. PubMed ID: 1610594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early and late phase events following bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement.
McGrath LB; Chen C; Bailey BM; Fernandez J; Laub GW; Adkins MS
J Card Surg; 1992 Sep; 7(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 1392233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term survival after tricuspid valve replacement. Results with seven different prostheses.
Jugdutt BI; Fraser RS; Lee SJ; Rossall RE; Callaghan JC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Jul; 74(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 141548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tricuspid valve replacement: clinical long-term results for acquired isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation.
Maleszka A; Kleikamp G; Koerfer R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):957-61. PubMed ID: 15597590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.
Redondo Palacios A; López Menéndez J; Miguelena Hycka J; Martín García M; Varela Barca L; Ferreiro Marzal A; Muñoz Pérez R; Oliva de Anquín E; García Andrade I; Centella Hernández T; Celemín Canorea D; Rodríguez-Roda Stuart J
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):739-746. PubMed ID: 27636399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical and hemodynamic prognosis after tricuspid valve replacement with bioprosthesis].
Jegaden O; Perinetti M; Barthelet M; Vedrinne C; Delahaye F; Montagna P; Mikaeloff P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1992 Oct; 85(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 1297289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position.
Kuwaki K; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Tsukamoto M; Abe T
Surg Today; 1998; 28(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 9681608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tricuspid valve replacement in rheumatic disease: preoperative predictors of hospital mortality.
Poveda JJ; Bernal JM; Matorras P; Hernando JP; Oliva MJ; Ochoteco A; Berrazueta JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 8834721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When should a mechanical tricuspid valve replacement be considered?
Said SM; Burkhart HM; Schaff HV; Johnson JN; Connolly HM; Dearani JA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 148(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 24199756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve: 19 years of experience.
Kawano H; Oda T; Fukunaga S; Tayama E; Kawara T; Oryoji A; Aoyagi S
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Nov; 18(5):565-9. PubMed ID: 11053818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical mid-term results after tricuspid valve replacement.
Viganò G; Guidotti A; Taramasso M; Giacomini A; Alfieri O
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 10(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 20147324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tricuspid valve replacement: results of an orphan procedure - which is the best prosthesis?
Wiedemann D; Rupprechter V; Mascherbauer J; Kammerlander A; Mora B; Dimitrov K; Weber B; Andreas M; Laufer G; Kocher A
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Aug; 59(4):626-632. PubMed ID: 29430890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: is biologic valve the unique solution?
de Vincentiis C; Kunkl AB; Trimarchi S; Gagliardotto P; Frigiola A; Menicanti L; Di Donato M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1296-301. PubMed ID: 18355513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: an 8-year experience.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Thiene G; Nesseris G; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jun; 127(6):1616-23. PubMed ID: 15173715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
