These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7495900)

  • 21. Hazard report. Switch failure may lead to patient injury from Siemens 3D-TOP x-ray tube.
    Health Devices; 2007 Mar; 36(3):96-7. PubMed ID: 17500265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The new x-ray ordinance].
    Schütz J
    Radiologe; 1988 Jan; 28(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3344343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preproduction quality assurance: quality intrinsic to design.
    Hudson BJ
    Med Des Mater; 1991 Apr; 1(4):34-40. PubMed ID: 10147993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Safety of medical products in the hospital: case examples and user feedback].
    Pflege; 2003 Dec; 16(6):367-9. PubMed ID: 14964136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Experiences with the North Rhine-Westphalia PsyKG (mental health regulation) exemplified by the city of Münster].
    Gollmer E
    Gesundheitswesen; 1999 Nov; 61(11):553-9. PubMed ID: 10628083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
    Hoeschen D; Buhr E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations].
    Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality assurance in diagnostic radiography: are we using it correctly and what is its future?
    Thornhill PJ
    Radiography; 1987; 53(610):161-3. PubMed ID: 3671699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constancy check of beam quality in conventional diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Badin RS; Leite MS; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1403-5. PubMed ID: 18434171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The reduction of the genetically significant dose in the Federal Republic of Germany as a consequence of expert examinations on medical x-ray equipments (author's transl)].
    Ewen K; Sprenger D
    Rofo; 1981 Sep; 135(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 6212341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The Medical Products Agency is responsible for the control of medical technological products: we need more active medical professionals reporting shortages].
    Philipson L
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Mar 5-11; 105(10):746-7. PubMed ID: 18422241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Medicine and Medical Devices Safety Authority in evaluating complementary and alternative medicines in Australia and New Zealand.
    Ghosh D; Skinner M; Ferguson LR
    Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 16481089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [New responsibilities via the health care structural law concerning inpatient treatment].
    Buck RA; Schlünz M
    Gesundheitswesen; 1994; 56(8-9):472-6. PubMed ID: 8000171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Reuse of "single use" medical devices after quality assured reprocessing: hygienic, legal and economic aspects. Potential for cost savings in interventional cardiology].
    Ischinger TA; Neubauer G; Ujlaky R; Schätzl H; Bock M
    Z Kardiol; 2002 Nov; 91(11):889-98. PubMed ID: 12442191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A compliance testing program for diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Hutchinson DE; Cobb BJ; Jacob CS
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):237-45. PubMed ID: 10028640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Changed guidelines by the federal medical office regarding quality dismissed. Caution in purchasing new enhancement screens].
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):274-5. PubMed ID: 7548259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medical device regulation in the United States and the European Union: a comparative study.
    Chai JY
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 12296349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Control of x-ray equipment for quality assurance (constancy testing)].
    Lang G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jul; 41(7):240-4. PubMed ID: 3413583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. French homologation for medical devices: past and future.
    Rader J
    Med Device Technol; 1993 Apr; 4(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 10171652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.