These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7496260)
1. Misleading meta-analysis. Subject to many potential biases. Gilbody S; House A; Song F; Sheldon T BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7015):1303-4. PubMed ID: 7496260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis. Tierney JF; Stewart LA Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis of antidepressant prescribing. Drop out rates presented in a misleading manner. Freemantle N; Mason J BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7007):751. PubMed ID: 7549711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary: Empirical evidence of attrition bias in clinical trials. Jüni P; Egger M Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 15649954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The missing data problem in meta-analyses. Rief W; Hofmann SG Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 65(2):238. PubMed ID: 18250263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of repeated measurements with dropouts among Alzheimer's disease patients using summary measures and meta-analysis. Talwalker S J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Mar; 6(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 8838778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding up the evidence: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Noordzij M; Zoccali C; Dekker FW; Jager KJ Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 119(4):c310-6. PubMed ID: 22135790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis. Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biases in meta-analysis and how to compensate. Lederman RP MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1992; 17(4):215. PubMed ID: 1635435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. Sterne JA; Egger M; Smith GD BMJ; 2001 Jul; 323(7304):101-5. PubMed ID: 11451790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust. Bero L PLoS Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):e2005972. PubMed ID: 29608562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated? Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review. Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misleading meta-analysis. "Fail safe N" is a useful mathematical measure of the stability of results. Persaud R BMJ; 1996 Jan; 312(7023):125. PubMed ID: 8555918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]