These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7496683)

  • 1. Technical note: inspiration or expiration? Reducing motion artefact in digital subtraction arch angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries.
    Withers DJ; Ashleigh RJ
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 68(813):1017-20. PubMed ID: 7496683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of patient motion artifacts in digital subtraction angiography: evaluation of a fast and fully automatic technique.
    Meijering EH; Niessen WJ; Bakker J; van Der Molen AJ; de Kort GA; Lo RT; Mali WP; Viergever MA
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):288-93. PubMed ID: 11274572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation.
    Carr JC; Ma J; Desphande V; Pereles S; Laub G; Finn JP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 11856670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in patients with cerebral ischaemia. Evaluation of extracranial carotid lesions.
    Mantoni M; Neergaard K
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 2591388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing misregistration of mask image in hepatic DSA.
    Katsuda T; Kuroda C; Fujita M
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 9253058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients.
    Chilcote WA; Modic MT; Pavlicek WA; Little JR; Furlan AJ; Duchesneau PM; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 7012921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ECG-synchronized DSA exposure control: improved cervicothoracic image quality.
    Kelly WM; Gould R; Norman D; Brant-Zawadzki M; Cox L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Oct; 143(4):857-60. PubMed ID: 6382980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limited usefulness of aortic arch angiography in the evaluation of carotid occlusive disease.
    Goldstein SJ; Fried AM; Young B; Tibbs PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 6976683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carotid bifurcation: results of spliced hybrid subtraction angiography compared with standard temporal and hybrid images.
    Burbank FH; Enzmann DR; Brody WR
    Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):227-9. PubMed ID: 3520646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid bifurcation.
    de Vries AR; Ludwig JW; Engels PH; Overtoom TT
    Int Angiol; 1985; 4(4):483-6. PubMed ID: 3834013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
    Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety of arch aortography for assessment of carotid arteries.
    Berczi V; Randall M; Balamurugan R; Shaw D; Venables GS; Cleveland TJ; Gaines PA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Jan; 31(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16233982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Study of the supra-aortic trunks using the humeral Seldinger technique and digitalized angiography of the aortic arch. Apropos of 175 cases].
    Boyer L; Badère JM; Dupont le Priol P; Viallet JF; Ribal JP; Glanddier G
    J Radiol; 1991 Oct; 72(10):497-502. PubMed ID: 1956004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The role of intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the detection of the cause of cerebral ischemia].
    Tomac B; Hebrang A; Jurković M; Vidaković Z
    Lijec Vjesn; 1989; 111(1-2):33-8. PubMed ID: 2661942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid artery disease. Can the decision for carotid artery surgery be made solely on the basis of its findings?
    Crocker EF; Tutton RH; Bowen JC
    J Vasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 4(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 3525871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
    Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction angiography in children.
    Wagner ML; Singleton EB; Egan ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 6336869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of digital subtraction angiography using optical flow method on occlusive cerebrovascular disease.
    Wu TH; Lin CJ; Lin YH; Guo WY; Huang TC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Sep; 111(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 23830639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.