These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7496707)

  • 1. An investigation into techniques for reducing doses from neo-natal radiographic examinations.
    Wraith CM; Martin CJ; Stockdale EJ; McDonald S; Farquhar B
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1074-82. PubMed ID: 7496707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.
    Mooney R; Thomas PS
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):852-60. PubMed ID: 9828798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
    Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
    England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital pelvic radiography: increasing distance to reduce dose.
    Heath R; England A; Ward A; Charnock P; Ward M; Evans P; Harding L
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 21908777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiology in the neonatal intensive care unit: dose reduction and image quality.
    McParland BJ; Gorka W; Lee R; Lewall DB; Omojola MF
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Oct; 69(826):929-37. PubMed ID: 9038529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs.
    Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Filtration to reduce paediatric dose for a linear slot-scanning digital X-ray machine.
    Perks TD; Dendere R; Irving B; Hartley T; Scholtz P; Lawson A; Trauernicht C; Steiner S; Douglas TS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 25433049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of radiographic technique for chest radiography.
    Warren-Forward HM; Millar JS
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 68(815):1221-9. PubMed ID: 8542230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose and image quality optimization in neonatal radiography.
    Dougeni ED; Delis HB; Karatza AA; Kalogeropoulou CP; Skiadopoulos SG; Mantagos SP; Panayiotakis GS
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Oct; 80(958):807-15. PubMed ID: 17875594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.
    Almén A; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Besjakov J; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1192-9. PubMed ID: 11144797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic image quality of mobile neonatal chest X-rays and the radiation exposure incurred.
    Lowe A; Finch A; Boniface D; Chaudhuri R; Shekhdar J
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):55-61. PubMed ID: 10341690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?
    Doherty P; O'Leary D; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1992-9. PubMed ID: 12942300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.