These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7496707)

  • 21. Image-quality perception as a function of dose in digital radiography.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Korkusuz H; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 22109295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal exposure parameters for digital radiography of the infant skull: a pilot study.
    Offiah AC; Grehan J; Hall CM; Todd-Pokropek A
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1195-204. PubMed ID: 16223616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose reduction in thorax radiography in simulated neonates with additional filtration and digital luminescence radiography.
    Seifert H; Jesberger HJ; Schneider G; Rein L; Blass G; Limbach HG; Niewald M; Sitzmann FC; Kramann B
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Sep; 39(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 9755700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A reduction in radiographic exposure and image quality in film screen postero-anterior chest radiography.
    Egbe NO; Egong EA; Ekpo EU; Inah GB
    Niger J Med; 2012; 21(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23301442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient dose in neonatal units.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Smet M; Bosmans H; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18757900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A study of chest radiography with mobile X-ray units.
    Simpson PD; Martin CJ; Darragh CL; Abel R
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jun; 71(846):640-5. PubMed ID: 9849388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Added copper filtration in digital paediatric double-contrast colon examinations: effects on radiation dose and image quality.
    Hansson B; Finnbogason T; Schuwert P; Persliden J
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(7):1117-22. PubMed ID: 9265687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiation doses from some common paediatric X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II; Elshiekh EH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 18765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality.
    Prasad SR; Wittram C; Shepard JA; McLoud T; Rhea J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 12130452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Entrance skin dosimetry and size-specific dose estimate from pediatric chest CTA.
    Westra SJ; Li X; Gulati K; Singh S; Liu B; Kalra MK; Abbara S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 24211194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effective dose in diagnostic radiology as a function of x-ray beam filtration for a constant exit dose and constant film density.
    Behrman RH; Yasuda G
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):780-90. PubMed ID: 9608491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiation dose quantities and risk in neonates in a special care baby unit.
    Armpilia CI; Fife IA; Croasdale PL
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jul; 75(895):590-5. PubMed ID: 12145132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation exposure to premature infants in a neonatal intensive care unit in Turkey.
    Olgar T; Onal E; Bor D; Okumus N; Atalay Y; Turkyilmaz C; Ergenekon E; Koc E
    Korean J Radiol; 2008; 9(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 18838850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.