These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7496710)

  • 1. An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.
    Glover P; Hykin J; Gowland P; Wright J; Johnson I; Mansfield P
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1090-4. PubMed ID: 7496710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo intrauterine sound pressure and temperature measurements during magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 T) in pregnant ewes.
    Ruckhäberle E; Nekolla SG; Ganter C; Schneider KT; Peter A; Raidt A; Kovacs L; Brockmeier SJ; Schwaiger M; Oberhoffer R; Papadopulos NA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18753758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?].
    Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-utero sound levels when vibroacoustic stimulation is applied to the maternal abdomen: an assessment of the possibility of cochlea damage in the fetus.
    Arulkumaran S; Talbert D; Hsu TS; Chua S; Anandakumar C; Ratnam SS
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jan; 99(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1547171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine sound levels: intrapartum assessment with an intrauterine microphone.
    Smith CV; Satt B; Phelan JP; Paul RH
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Oct; 7(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 2222618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vibroacoustic stimulation and intrauterine sound pressure levels.
    Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Hsu TS; Ratnam SS; Till O; Westgren M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):803-6. PubMed ID: 1923201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of fetal exposure to external loud noise using a sheep model: quantification of in utero acoustic transmission across the human audio range.
    Gélat P; David AL; Haqhenas SR; Henriques J; Thibaut de Maisieres A; White T; Jauniaux E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):343.e1-343.e11. PubMed ID: 31152712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewes by sound applied to the abdomen.
    Gerhardt KJ; Abrams RM; Kovaz BM; Gomez KJ; Conlon M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 159(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 3394740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound levels in the human uterus.
    Richards DS; Frentzen B; Gerhardt KJ; McCann ME; Abrams RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 1635729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Echo planar imaging at 4 Tesla with minimum acoustic noise.
    Tomasi DG; Ernst T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 12815648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Gerhardt KJ; Abrams RM
    J Perinatol; 2000 Dec; 20(8 Pt 2):S21-30. PubMed ID: 11190697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fetal sound environment during vibroacoustic stimulation in labor: effect on fetal heart rate response.
    Gagnon R; Benzaquen S; Hunse C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):950-5. PubMed ID: 1579320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea.
    Gan RZ; Reeves BP; Wang X
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2180-95. PubMed ID: 17882549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The trapped fluid transducer: modeling and optimization.
    Cheng L; Grosh K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4152-64. PubMed ID: 18537367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The intrauterine sound environment of the human fetus during labor.
    Benzaquen S; Gagnon R; Hunse C; Foreman J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 163(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 2386134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.