BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7498011)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of Norplant in Kumasi, Ghana.
    Martey JO; Turkson SO; Djan JO; Dunson TR; Amatya R; Krueger S
    East Afr Med J; 1995 Jun; 72(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 7498011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and acceptability of NORPLANT implants in Sri Lanka.
    Basnayake S; Thapa S; Balogh SA
    Stud Fam Plann; 1988; 19(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 3129828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The introduction of a new contraceptive; two years experience with Norplant.
    Davie J; Hiremath K; Glasier A
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1996 Jul; 54(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 8783485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
    Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contraception with levonorgestrel subdermal implants (Norplant) in Benin-City, Nigeria: a 12-year review.
    Aisien AO
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2007 Apr; 11(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 17982951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Norplant implants in Ethiopia.
    Argina H; Lukman HY
    East Afr Med J; 1997 Apr; 74(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 9299831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics and attitudes of early contraceptive implant acceptors in Texas.
    Frank ML; Poindexter AN; Johnson ML; Bateman L
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(5):208-13. PubMed ID: 1426182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of the acceptability and effectiveness of Norplant (R) contraceptive implants in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    Arshat H; Rachagan SP; Kwa Siew Kim ; Ang Eng Suan ; Karim HA; Ismail MT
    Malays J Reprod Health; 1990 Jun; 8(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12316341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Norplant use among Bangladeshi women.
    Newsl Womens Glob Netw Reprod Rights; 1994; (45):16. PubMed ID: 12318720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women.
    Kalmuss D; Davidson AR; Cushman LF; Heartwell S; Rulin M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(6):256-60. PubMed ID: 8959415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Tolerance and acceptability of Norplant contraceptive devices].
    Ba MG; Moreau JC; Diadhiou F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Dec; 31(8):765-71. PubMed ID: 12592196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant contraception in Singaporean women: one decade of experience in KK Women's and Children's Hospital.
    Kang W; Tan KH
    Singapore Med J; 2004 Oct; 45(10):482-6. PubMed ID: 15455169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adolescent girls' attitudes toward contraceptive subdermal implants.
    Dabrow SM; Merrick CL; Conlon M
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 May; 16(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 7662685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contraceptive implants.
    Ladipo O; Coutinho EM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 6(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 7893965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Menstrual changes during Norplant use and return of fertility following Norplant implant removal: the Singapore experience.
    Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1991; 7(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 12284216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptance and perceptions of NORPLANT among users in San Francisco, USA.
    Darney PD; Atkinson E; Tanner S; MacPherson S; Hellerstein S; Alvarado A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1990; 21(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 2115699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of weight, packed cell volume changes and menstrual pattern in Norplant implant acceptors in Ilorin, Nigeria.
    Balogun OR
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 10(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 17902502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.