BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7498735)

  • 1. Competition between mitochondrial haplotypes in distinct nuclear genetic environments: Drosophila pseudoobscura vs. D. persimilis.
    Hutter CM; Rand DM
    Genetics; 1995 Jun; 140(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 7498735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for non-neutrality of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    MacRae AF; Anderson WW
    Genetics; 1988 Oct; 120(2):485-94. PubMed ID: 3197957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interspecific cytoplasmic gene flow in the absence of nuclear gene flow: evidence from Drosophila.
    Powell JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1983 Jan; 80(2):492-5. PubMed ID: 6300849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential fitness of mitochondrial DNA in perturbation cage studies correlates with global abundance and population history in Drosophila simulans.
    Ballard JW; James AC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Jun; 271(1544):1197-201. PubMed ID: 15306370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nuclear-mitochondrial epistasis and drosophila aging: introgression of Drosophila simulans mtDNA modifies longevity in D. melanogaster nuclear backgrounds.
    Rand DM; Fry A; Sheldahl L
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):329-41. PubMed ID: 16219776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in
    Mossman JA; Ge JY; Navarro F; Rand DM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Apr; 9(4):1175-1188. PubMed ID: 30745378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes.
    Sackton TB; Haney RA; Rand DM
    Evolution; 2003 Oct; 57(10):2315-25. PubMed ID: 14628919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and mating preference in Colombian Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Jenkins TM; Babcock CS; Geiser DM; Anderson WW
    Genetics; 1996 Jan; 142(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 8770596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mitochondrial DNA variation in Drosophila pseudoobscura and related species in Pacific northwest populations.
    Hale LR; Beckenbach AT
    Can J Genet Cytol; 1985 Jun; 27(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 3880378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mitochondrial DNA effects on fitness in Drosophila subobscura.
    Christie JS; Picornell A; Moya A; Ramon MM; Castro JA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Sep; 107(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 21364694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mitochondrial genomic variation drives differential nuclear gene expression in discrete regions of Drosophila gene and protein interaction networks.
    Mossman JA; Biancani LM; Rand DM
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):691. PubMed ID: 31477008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Brockett MM; Alavi H; Anderson WW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):3080-2. PubMed ID: 8610171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conditional hitchhiking of mitochondrial DNA: frequency shifts of Drosophila melanogaster mtDNA variants depend on nuclear genetic background.
    Kilpatrick ST; Rand DM
    Genetics; 1995 Nov; 141(3):1113-24. PubMed ID: 8582617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assortative mating and fertility in two Drosophila subobscura strains with different mitochondrial DNA haplotypes.
    Castro JA; Oliver P; Christie JS; Picornell A; Ramon M; Moya A
    Genetica; 2003 Nov; 119(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 14686608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives.
    Machado CA; Kliman RM; Markert JA; Hey J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):472-88. PubMed ID: 11919289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequencies of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in laboratory cage populations of the mosquito, Aedes albopictus.
    Kambhampati S; Rai KS; Verleye DM
    Genetics; 1992 Sep; 132(1):205-9. PubMed ID: 1398054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nuclear background affects frequency dynamics of mitochondrial DNA variants in Drosophila simulans.
    Nigro L
    Heredity (Edinb); 1994 Jun; 72 ( Pt 6)():582-6. PubMed ID: 8056616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response of Drosophila persimilis to phototactic and geotactic selection.
    Polivanov S
    Behav Genet; 1975 Jul; 5(3):255-67. PubMed ID: 1131150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The speciation history of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives: inferences from DNA sequence variation at the period locus.
    Wang RL; Hey J
    Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1113-26. PubMed ID: 8913754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.