These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7499144)

  • 1. Development of a system to evaluate and communicate radiation risk.
    Wiatrowski WA; Giles ER; Cooke EP
    Health Phys; 1996 Jan; 70(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 7499144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effective doses in nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures in Greece].
    El-Mantani Ordoulidis S; Siabanopoulou M
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(3):304-6. PubMed ID: 19936353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ESTIMATION OF FEMALE RADIATION DOSES AND BREAST CANCER RISK FROM CHEST CT EXAMINATIONS.
    Lahham A; ALMasri H; Kameel S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 29237054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent in human research: what to say and how to say it.
    Reiman RE
    Health Phys; 2013 Feb; 104(2 Suppl 1):S17-22. PubMed ID: 23287515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond dose assessment: using risk with full disclosure of uncertainty in public and scientific communication.
    Hoffman FO; Kocher DC; Apostoaei AI
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 21979547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 20736332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation doses for pediatric nuclear medicine studies: comparing the North American consensus guidelines and the pediatric dosage card of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.
    Grant FD; Gelfand MJ; Drubach LA; Treves ST; Fahey FH
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Apr; 45(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 25367355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study.
    Litmanovich D; Tack D; Lin PJ; Boiselle PM; Raptopoulos V; Bankier AA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):929-34. PubMed ID: 21940581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonuniform transmission in brain SPECT using 201Tl, 153Gd, and 99mTc static line sources: anthropomorphic dosimetry studies and influence on brain quantification.
    Van Laere K; Koole M; Kauppinen T; Monsieurs M; Bouwens L; Dierck R
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 41(12):2051-62. PubMed ID: 11138692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac imaging modalities with ionizing radiation: the role of informed consent.
    Paterick TE; Jan MF; Paterick ZR; Tajik AJ; Gerber TC
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 22698534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organ-based tube current modulation: are women's breasts positioned in the reduced-dose zone?
    Taylor S; Litmanovich DE; Shahrzad M; Bankier AA; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 25153159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities.
    Zanzonico P; Dauer L; St Germain J
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):554-70. PubMed ID: 18849690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimated radiation risk of cancer from dental cone-beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics patients.
    Yeh JK; Chen CH
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):131. PubMed ID: 30075771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incident air kerma to absorbed organ dose conversion factors for breast and lung in PA thorax radiography: The effect of patient thickness and radiation quality.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Vock P
    Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1594-1601. PubMed ID: 27914781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation absorbed dose estimates for positron emission tomography (PET): inert gases 19Ne and 77Kr.
    Kearfott KJ
    Health Phys; 1983 Mar; 44(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 6601093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
    Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiation dose to anthropomorphic paediatric models from positron-emitting labelled tracers.
    Xie T; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(5):1165-87. PubMed ID: 24557029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Estimation of frequency, population doses and stochastic risks in medical uses of radiopharmaceuticals in Japan, 1982. 2. Determination of organ or tissue doses and effective dose equivalents].
    Maruyama T; Yamaguchi H; Noda Y; Kumamoto Y; Iwai K; Nishizawa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Dec; 48(12):1536-43. PubMed ID: 3251189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluorine-18-fluoromisonidazole radiation dosimetry in imaging studies.
    Graham MM; Peterson LM; Link JM; Evans ML; Rasey JS; Koh WJ; Caldwell JH; Krohn KA
    J Nucl Med; 1997 Oct; 38(10):1631-6. PubMed ID: 9379204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.