176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7499650)
1. Assessing the duration of mandibular soft tissue anesthesia.
Hersh EV; Hermann DG; Lamp CJ; Johnson PD; MacAfee KA
J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Nov; 126(11):1531-6. PubMed ID: 7499650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Solutions on Injection Pain, Efficacy, and Duration of Soft-Tissue Anesthesia with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Molars.
Elbay ÜŞ; Elbay M; Kaya E; Yıldırım S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27805885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the combination of 3% mepivacaine plain plus 2% lidocaine with epinephrine improve anesthesia and reduce the pain of anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Lammers E; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M; Fowler S
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1287-92. PubMed ID: 25146009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of six local anesthetic formulations used for posterior mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia.
Abdulwahab M; Boynes S; Moore P; Seifikar S; Al-Jazzaf A; Alshuraidah A; Zovko J; Close J
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Aug; 140(8):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19654255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block.
Berberich G; Reader A; Drum M; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1498-504. PubMed ID: 19840637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anesthetic Efficacy of a Combination of 4% Prilocaine/2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine for the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
Cook O; Nusstein J; Drum M; Fowler S; Reader A; Draper J
J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):683-688. PubMed ID: 29459150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 16776407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block.
Forloine A; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1770-7. PubMed ID: 20951285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients.
Ezmek B; Arslan A; Delilbasi C; Sencift K
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 20835569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block.
McLean C; Reader A; Beck M; Meryers WJ
J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 8509754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mason R; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19720211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pain on injection of prilocaine plain vs. lidocaine with epinephrine. A prospective double-blind study.
Wahl MJ; Overton D; Howell J; Siegel E; Schmitt MM; Muldoon M
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 132(10):1396-401; quiz 1460. PubMed ID: 11680354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled trial comparing mandibular local anesthesia techniques in children receiving nitrous oxide-oxygen sedation.
Naidu S; Loughlin P; Coldwell SE; Noonan CJ; Milgrom P
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15106686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of beta-adrenoreceptor blockade with nadolol on the duration of local anesthesia.
Zhang C; Banting DW; Gelb AW; Hamilton JT
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Dec; 130(12):1773-80. PubMed ID: 10599182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.
Wali M; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J
J Endod; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1459-62. PubMed ID: 20728709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Needle-less local anesthesia: clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the jet anesthesia Injex in local anesthesia in dentistry.
Dabarakis NN; Alexander V; Tsirlis AT; Parissis NA; Nikolaos M
Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(10):E572-6. PubMed ID: 18197315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
