These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7500476)

  • 1. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .
    Kavoussi LR; Moore RG; Adams JB; Partin AW
    J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2134-6. PubMed ID: 7500476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.
    Partin AW; Adams JB; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 7582231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a robotic system as surgical first assistant in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
    Drasin T; Dutson E; Gracia C
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Sep; 199(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 15325605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.
    Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic remote laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: the initial experience.
    Gill IS; Sung GT; Hsu TH; Meraney AM
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):2082-5. PubMed ID: 11061931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].
    Benincà G; Garrone C; Rebecchi F; Giaccone C; Morino M
    Chir Ital; 2003; 55(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 12872566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice-controlled robotic arm in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bacá I; Schultz C; Grzybowski L; Göetzen V
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 10411970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.
    Huffmanm LC; Pandalai PK; Boulton BJ; James L; Starnes SL; Reed MF; Howington JA; Nussbaum MS
    Surgery; 2007 Oct; 142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. PubMed ID: 17950356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus human camera holding in video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy: a single blind randomized trial of efficacy and safety.
    Martins Rua JF; Jatene FB; de Campos JR; Monteiro R; Tedde ML; Samano MN; Bernardo WM; Das-Neves-Pereira JC
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 8(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 19042929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent upper and lower urinary tract robotic surgery: strategies for success.
    Eun D; Bhandari A; Boris R; Rogers C; Bhandari M; Menon M
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 17784881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control.
    Kondraske GV; Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fischer CA; Tesfay ST; Taneja R; Brown RJ; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Nov; 16(11):1523-7. PubMed ID: 12098023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Kaouk JH; Goel RK
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19185415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.