124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7500757)
1. Revising the research record.
Horton R
Lancet; 1995 Dec; 346(8990):1610-1. PubMed ID: 7500757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaking up science.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflections on a retraction.
Kennedy D
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1137. PubMed ID: 10970223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrity in research publishing and professional accountability.
Holt GR
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2013 May; 15(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 23411572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disgraced COVID-19 studies are still routinely cited.
Piller C
Science; 2021 Jan; 371(6527):331-332. PubMed ID: 33479130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Stop citing fraudulent and duplicate articles].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2007 May; 36(5 Pt 1):749-52. PubMed ID: 17398065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can we trust your data?
Moore S
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Nov; 38(6):615. PubMed ID: 22037323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.
Smith R
BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):288-91. PubMed ID: 16052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
Cooper-Mahkorn D
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Elsevier investigates hundreds of peer reviewers for manipulating citations.
Singh Chawla D
Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):174. PubMed ID: 31506633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Major publisher retracts 43 papers, alleging fake peer review.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1783. PubMed ID: 25832507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Update on Scholarly Publication Ethics: Navigating the Confusing Landscape.
Reid C; Cress P
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1195-1197. PubMed ID: 27329663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Referencing retracted articles.
Emmett M
Am J Med; 2006 Jul; 119(7):e7. PubMed ID: 16828619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
