124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7500757)
21. Look before you quote.
Dickerson K; Hewitt P
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Oct; 293(6553):1000-2. PubMed ID: 12587580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Publishing: Journals' role in ethical research.
Baumgartner H
Nature; 2012 Apr; 484(7392):37. PubMed ID: 22481345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
Hadi MA
Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The role and responsibilities of coauthors.
Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9641):778. PubMed ID: 18774402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
Wylie DT
Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The fate of scientific articles when errors and scientific misconduct are detected].
Vinther S; Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jan; 176(4A):V07130425. PubMed ID: 25347246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retraction rates are on the rise.
Cokol M; Ozbay F; Rodriguez-Esteban R
EMBO Rep; 2008 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 18174889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
Kritchevsky D
Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Some thoughts on the ethics of research and publication.
Rockwell S
Radiat Res; 2002 Jan; 157(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11754634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Fraudulent and redundant publication.
Bulstrode C; Fulford P
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Nov; 77(6):845-6. PubMed ID: 7593092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
Wager E; Williams P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. For the record.
Krimsky S
Nat Genet; 2002 Feb; 30(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 11818959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientific misconduct. Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5717):1851. PubMed ID: 15790813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Why published research is untrustworthy.
Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1271-1274. PubMed ID: 28707207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Publication ethics.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
