74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7501332)
1. A randomized trial of two preparations of vaginal prostaglandin for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Murray HG; Buonocore A; Hawley J
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 86(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 7501332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor. Insert vs. tablet.
Rabl M; Joura EA; Yücel Y; Egarter C
J Reprod Med; 2002 Feb; 47(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11883349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening.
Sharami SH; Milani F; Zahiri Z; Mansour-Ghanaei F
Med Sci Monit; 2005 Aug; 11(8):CR381-6. PubMed ID: 16049380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of two methods.
Krammer J; Williams MC; Sawai SK; O'Brien WF
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 7898843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor.
Atad J; Hallak M; Auslender R; Porat-Packer T; Zarfati D; Abramovici H
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 8559528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
Shetty A; Livingston I; Acharya S; Templeton A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Del Valle GO; Delke I; Schroeder PA; Briones DK
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 8437780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morning compared with evening induction of labor: a nested randomized controlled trial. A nested randomized controlled trial.
Dodd JM; Crowther CA; Robinson JS
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 16880306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor.
Mazhar SB; Imran R; Alam K
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 12814527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor by intracervical prostaglandin gel and oxytocin infusion in primigravid women with unfavorable cervix.
Ashrafunnessa ; Khatun SS; Chowdhury SA; Begum SR; Rashid M; Khatun MS
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1997 Dec; 23(3):66-71. PubMed ID: 9621474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
Rouben D; Arias F
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in patients with an indication for delivery.
Darroca RJ; Buttino L; Miller J; Khamis HJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 8559529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel.
Khan ZA; Abdul B; Majoko F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 31(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 21823846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endocervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Clinical trial results.
Trofatter KF
J Reprod Med; 1993 Jan; 38(1 Suppl):78-82. PubMed ID: 8429531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]