122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7501812)
21. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries.
Izewska J; Andreo P; Vatnitsky S; Shortt KR
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Oct; 69(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 14597361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Materials for thermoluminescent dose detectors and photon radiation energy detectors intended for intercomparison procedures of radiation therapy units.
Kalmykov LZ
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1715-9. PubMed ID: 7891631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
Hauri P; Schneider U
Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comprehensive study of LiF TL response to high energy photons and electrons.
Bagne F
Radiology; 1977 Jun; 123(3):753-60. PubMed ID: 404666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental determination of the photon-energy dependent dose-to-water response of TLD600 and TLD700 (LiF:Mg,Ti) thermoluminescence detectors.
Schwahofer A; Feist H; Georg H; Häring P; Schlegel W
Z Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 26972816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Response of TLD-100 in mixed fields of photons and electrons.
Lawless MJ; Junell S; Hammer C; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):012103. PubMed ID: 23298105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence of diamond thermoluminescent dosimeters in radiotherapy beams.
Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1913-27. PubMed ID: 9364587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.
Kirby TH; Hanson WF; Johnston DA
Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1427-33. PubMed ID: 1461205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields.
Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of the intrinsic energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources relative to 60Co.
Reed JL; Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Micka JA; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122103. PubMed ID: 25471976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. External audits of electron beams using mailed TLD dosimetry: preliminary results.
Gomola I; Van Dam J; Isern-Verdum J; Verstraete J; Reymen R; Dutreix A; Davis B; Huyskens D
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 11166867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The energy dependence and dose response of a commercial optically stimulated luminescent detector for kilovoltage photon, megavoltage photon, and electron, proton, and carbon beams.
Reft CS
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1690-9. PubMed ID: 19544786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of a TLD mailed system for remote dosimetry audit for (192)Ir HDR and PDR sources.
Roué A; Venselaar JL; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Van Dam J
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Apr; 83(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17368842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the clinical use of TLD.
Rudén BI
Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1976 Oct; 15(5):447-64. PubMed ID: 827192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A thermoluminescent dosimetry postal dose inter-comparison of radiation therapy centres in Malaysia.
Rassiah P; Ng KH; DeWerd LA; Kunugi K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Mar; 27(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15156705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Remote auditing of radiotherapy facilities using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Lye J; Dunn L; Kenny J; Lehmann J; Kron T; Oliver C; Butler D; Alves A; Johnston P; Franich R; Williams I
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032102. PubMed ID: 24593737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
