141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7501825)
41. Direct MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction: feasibility for assessing articular cartilage.
Llopis E; Cerezal L; Kassarjian A; Higueras V; Fernandez E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):1124-8. PubMed ID: 18356464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computed tomography for the detection of chondral lesions of the knee.
Smith TO; Drew BT; Toms AP; Donell ST; Hing CB
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Dec; 20(12):2367-79. PubMed ID: 22270676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. MR arthrography in chondromalacia patellae diagnosis on a low-field open magnet system.
Harman M; Ipeksoy U; Dogan A; Arslan H; Etlik O
Clin Imaging; 2003; 27(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 12727059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Direct MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction: feasibility for assessing articular cartilage.
Wettstein M; Guntern D; Theumann N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):W206; author reply W207. PubMed ID: 18941057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Application value of FS-3D-FISP sequence in the diagnosis of ankle cartilage injury].
Zhao C; Bi Q; Xia B; Di XB; Zhu DJ; Zheng J; Hong JF; Qiu BS; Zhang SJ; Gu HF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 90(25):1752-5. PubMed ID: 20979892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. MR arthrography: anatomic-pathologic investigation.
Hajek PC; Baker LL; Sartoris DJ; Neumann CH; Resnick D
Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 3823427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in grading knee chondral defects.
Zhang M; Min Z; Rana N; Liu H
Arthroscopy; 2013 Feb; 29(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 22906758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnosis of chondral lesions of the knee joint: can MRI replace arthroscopy? A prospective study.
Friemert B; Oberländer Y; Schwarz W; Häberle HJ; Bähren W; Gerngross H; Danz B
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Jan; 12(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 12904842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Chondromalacia patellae: assessment with MR imaging.
Yulish BS; Montanez J; Goodfellow DB; Bryan PJ; Mulopulos GP; Modic MT
Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):763-6. PubMed ID: 3615877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reliability of clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of chondromalacia patellae.
Pihlajamäki HK; Kuikka PI; Leppänen VV; Kiuru MJ; Mattila VM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 92(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 20360517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The optimization of chondromalacia patellae diagnosis by NMR tomography. The use of an apparatus for cartilage compression].
König H; Dinkelaker F; Wolf KJ
Rofo; 1991 Aug; 155(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 1878541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography of the orbits. Initial experiences using the paramagnetic contrast medium gadolinium-DTPA].
Markl A; Riedel KG; Oeckler R; Vogl T; Scheidhauer K
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Dec; 6(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 3816049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computer tomography in the detection of chondral lesions of the hip.
Smith TO; Simpson M; Ejindu V; Hing CB
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Apr; 23(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 23412284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Chondral lesions of the patella evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy.
Handelberg F; Shahabpour M; Casteleyn PP
Arthroscopy; 1990; 6(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 2310445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The diagnostic value and limitation of magnetic resonance imaging on chondral lesions in the knee joint.
Ochi M; Sumen Y; Kanda T; Ikuta Y; Itoh K
Arthroscopy; 1994 Apr; 10(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 8003145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee.
Van Dyck P; Kenis C; Vanhoenacker FM; Lambrecht V; Wouters K; Gielen JL; Dossche L; Parizel PM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Jun; 22(6):1376-84. PubMed ID: 24105346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. MR arthrography of the elbow: normal anatomy and diagnostic pitfalls.
Cotten A; Jacobson J; Brossmann J; Hodler J; Trudell D; Resnick D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 9216754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Evaluation of cartilage defects in the knee: validity of clinical, magnetic-resonance-imaging and radiological findings compared with arthroscopy].
Spahn G; Wittig R; Kahl E; Klinger HM; Mückley T; Hofmann GO
Unfallchirurg; 2007 May; 110(5):414-24. PubMed ID: 17323059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients.
Spiers AS; Meagher T; Ostlere SJ; Wilson DJ; Dodd CA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1993 Jan; 75(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8421033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Lunate chondromalacia: evaluation of routine MRI sequences.
Bordalo-Rodrigues M; Schweitzer M; Bergin D; Culp R; Barakat MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1464-9. PubMed ID: 15855097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
