These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy. Eleraky M; Setzer M; Baaj AA; Papanastassiou I; Conrad BP; Vrionis FD J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Nov; 13(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 21039154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model. Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation. Mihara H; Cheng BC; David SM; Ohnari K; Zdeblick TA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior stabilization at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. Kreshak JL; Kim DH; Lindsey DP; Kam AC; Panjabi MM; Yerby SA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(24):2763-70. PubMed ID: 12486344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Coe JD; Warden KE; Sutterlin CE; McAfee PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1989 Oct; 14(10):1122-31. PubMed ID: 2588063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative biomechanical study of spinal fixation using the combination spinal rod-plate and transpedicular screw fixation system. Chang KW; Dewei Z; McAfee PC; Warden KE; Farey ID; Gurr KR J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 2980253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization. Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems. Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]