163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7502166)
1. [Radiation exposure of the patient exemplified by lateral cranial image in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the film-screen system].
Seifert H; Kubale R; Blass G; Kunz G; Wagner P; Kramann B; Leetz HK
Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Oct; 48(10):298-303. PubMed ID: 7502166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reduction of radiation exposure with digital luminescence radiography exemplified by roentgen diagnosis of the pediatric pelvis].
Schedel H; Steger W; Hilbertz T; Zellner A; Fink U; Hidajat N
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Oct; 47(10):293-6. PubMed ID: 7801191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A study of dose reduction using digital luminescence radiography for lateral skull radiography.
Seifert H; Kubale R; Hagen T; Kramann B; Leetz HK
Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):311-7. PubMed ID: 8665130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
Vosshenrich R; Weigel W; Fischer U; Funke M; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uroradiographic dosimetry using a rare-earth screen-film system.
Segal AJ; Maillie HD; Lemkin JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):923-6. PubMed ID: 6981976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction in lateral cephalometry using rare-earth screens.
Hutton JB; Brennan AG; Bird PD
Br Dent J; 1987 Dec; 163(12):378-82. PubMed ID: 3480732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
Schreiner-Karoussou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
Seifert H; Chapot C
J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
Busch HP; Winter-Nossek A; Bethke U; Kohler P; Georgi M
Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of radiation exposures between conventional and rare-earth screen/film systems.
Chu WK; Sangster W; Dobry CA
Health Phys; 1985 Nov; 49(5):958-61. PubMed ID: 4066354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
