These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7502607)

  • 1. Effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the ability of human subjects to discriminate changes in texture.
    Zompa IC; Chapman CE
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1995; 12(2):87-102. PubMed ID: 7502607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey.
    Meftah el-M; Shenasa J; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3133-49. PubMed ID: 12466436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans.
    Post LJ; Chapman CE
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1991; 8(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 1887725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of simulated texture patterns on the human hand.
    Kops CE; Gardner EP
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Aug; 76(2):1145-65. PubMed ID: 8871227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial attentional shifts: further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli.
    Butter CM; Buchtel HA; Santucci R
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(10):1231-40. PubMed ID: 2594169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics.
    Lederman SJ; Abbott SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):902-15. PubMed ID: 6457101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.
    Meck WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():528-41. PubMed ID: 6588813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The roles of lower- and higher-order surface statistics in tactile texture perception.
    Kuroki 黒木 忍 S; Sawayama 澤山 正貴 M; Nishida 西田 眞也 S
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jul; 126(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 34038163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of spatially selective attention in the tactile perception of texture.
    Sathian K; Burton H
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Sep; 50(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 1754365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent controls of attentional influences in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.
    Chapman CE; Meftah el-M
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4094-107. PubMed ID: 16148278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.
    Badde S; Navarro KT; Landy MS
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104170. PubMed ID: 32036027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal discrimination of cross-modal and unimodal stimuli in generalized dystonia.
    Aglioti SM; Fiorio M; Forster B; Tinazzi M
    Neurology; 2003 Mar; 60(5):782-5. PubMed ID: 12629233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage.
    Mattingley JB; Driver J; Beschin N; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jun; 35(6):867-80. PubMed ID: 9204491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative method for determining spatial discriminative capacity.
    Zhang Z; Tannan V; Holden JK; Dennis RG; Tommerdahl M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2008 Mar; 7():12. PubMed ID: 18331644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.
    Macaluso E; Eimer M; Frith CD; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 12592504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical mechanisms underlying tactile discrimination in the monkey. I. Role of primary somatosensory cortex in passive texture discrimination.
    Tremblay F; Ageranioti-Bélanger SA; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 76(5):3382-403. PubMed ID: 8930280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.