These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7503040)

  • 1. Pulpal response in electrothermal debonding.
    Takla PM; Shivapuja PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 7503040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histological evaluation after electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Kailasam V; Valiathan A; Rao N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 24992840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets. An in vitro study.
    Brouns EM; Schopf PM; Kocjancic B
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8500537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical and electrothermal debonding: effect on ceramic veneers and dental pulp.
    Lee-Knight CT; Wylie SG; Major PW; Glover KE; Grace M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9294354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk of pulp damage due to temperature increase during thermodebonding of ceramic brackets.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Radlanski RJ; Artun J; Loidl H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 9458595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermal image analysis of electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Cummings M; Biagioni P; Lamey PJ; Burden DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 10327734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrothermal debracketing: patient acceptance and effects on the dental pulp.
    Dovgan JS; Walton RE; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 7661140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Stein H; Miethke RR; Nakata M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 1476106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser.
    Ma T; Marangoni RD; Flint W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9057621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Sernetz F; Kraut J
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 1812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comment on electrothermal debonding.
    Dovgan JS; Walton R; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):15A. PubMed ID: 8659462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histopathologic evaluation of pulpal tissue response to various adhesive cleanup techniques.
    Bicakci AA; Kocoglu-Altan B; Celik-Ozenci C; Tekcan M; Babacan H; Gungör E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):12.e1-7; discussion 12-3. PubMed ID: 20620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Kraut J; Radin S; Trowbridge HI; Emling RC; Yankell SL
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):92-6. PubMed ID: 1812905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography.
    Abdulaziz A; El-Kholy MM; Bushra SS; Ali SM; Shehab KA
    Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 39(1):156. PubMed ID: 38869676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an ex vivo study.
    Kearns HP; Sandham JA; Bryan Jones W; Lagerström L
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 24(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A temperature rise in the dental pulp during the electrothermal removal of ceramic brackets].
    Ruppenthal T; Baumann MA
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Apr; 53(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 1577344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.