BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7504219)

  • 1. [Feasibility of a cyclophosphamide methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil regime intravenously administered with and without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in surgically treated breast carcinoma].
    Garrone O; Del Mastro L; Mariani GL; Ardizzoni A; Venturini M; Rosso R
    Minerva Med; 1993 Sep; 84(9):467-72. PubMed ID: 7504219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acute hematologic feasibility of G-CSF supported dose-escalated FEC therapy as adjuvant treatment after breast cancer surgery.
    Ottosson S; Magnusson K; Hultborn R
    Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(5C):4429-34. PubMed ID: 10650787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective, randomized trial of sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after standard-dose chemotherapy in cancer patients.
    Palmeri S; Leonardi V; Danova M; Porta C; Ferrari S; Fincato G; Citarrella P
    Haematologica; 1999 Nov; 84(11):1016-23. PubMed ID: 10553163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, and high dose leucovorin (NFL) versus intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.
    Hainsworth JD; Jolivet J; Birch R; Hopkins LG; Greco FA
    Cancer; 1997 Feb; 79(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 9024712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The increase of the rate of hemopoietic recovery and clinical benefit of the erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) after intensive cyclic chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients.
    Filip S; Vanásek J; Bláha M; Mericka P; Vávrová J; Podzimek K
    Neoplasma; 1999; 46(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 10613592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prior to and following high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a phase I/II trial.
    Bernstein SH; Fay JP; Christiansen NP; Pinero L; Shah D; Stephan M; Herzig GP
    Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Sep; 3(9):1519-26. PubMed ID: 9815838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.
    Sessa C; Pagani O; Parma G; Goldhirsch A; Cavalli F
    Semin Oncol; 1995 Jun; 22(3 Suppl 6):112-7. PubMed ID: 7541152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The additive effect of peripheral blood stem cells, harvested with low-dose cyclophosphamide, to autologous bone marrow reinfusion on hematopoietic reconstitution after ablative chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with localized disease.
    de Graaf H; Mulder NH; Willemse PH; van der Graaf WT; Sleijfer DT; Zijlstra JG; Elias M; Sibinga CT; Vellenga E; de Vries EG
    Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(6B):2851-6. PubMed ID: 8669878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Very large amounts of peripheral blood progenitor cells eliminate severe thrombocytopenia after high-dose melphalan in advanced breast cancer patients.
    Benedetti G; Patoia L; Giglietti A; Alessio M; Pelicci P; Grignani F
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Nov; 24(9):971-9. PubMed ID: 10556956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A feasibility study of multiple cycle therapy with melphalan, thiotepa, and paclitaxel followed by mitoxantrone, thiotepa, and paclitaxel with autologous hematopoietic cell support for metastatic breast cancer.
    Hu WW; Long GD; Stockerl-Goldstein KE; Johnston LJ; Chao NJ; Negrin RS; Blume KG
    Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Nov; 5(11):3411-8. PubMed ID: 10589752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two different schedules of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor during treatment for acute lymphocytic leukemia with a hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone) regimen.
    Weiser MA; O'Brien S; Thomas DA; Pierce SA; Lam TP; Kantarjian HM
    Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 11900213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of schedule on acute toxicity and dose-intensity of high-dose chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus colony stimulating factors in advanced breast cancer.
    De Placido S; Lauria R; Carlomagno C; Perrone F; De Laurentiis M; Gallo C; Martignetti A; Bellelli T; Limite G; Petrella G; Bianco AR
    Int J Oncol; 1999 Aug; 15(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 10402245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of a dose-intensive CMF regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer.
    Bos AM; de Graaf H; de Vries EG; Piersma H; Willemse PH
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Jun; 82(12):1920-4. PubMed ID: 10864198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.
    Papaldo P; Lopez M; Marolla P; Cortesi E; Antimi M; Terzoli E; Vici P; Barone C; Ferretti G; Di Cosimo S; Carlini P; Nisticò C; Conti F; Di Lauro L; Botti C; Di Filippo F; Fabi A; Giannarelli D; Calabresi F
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6908-18. PubMed ID: 16129844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy and GM-CSF plus G-CSF in breast cancer.
    Charrier S; Chollet P; Bay JO; Curé H; Kwiatkowski F; Portefaix G; Communal Y; Bétail G; Plagne R; Chassagne J
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Apr; 25(7):705-10. PubMed ID: 10745254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with rotational CMF, epirubicin and vincristine as primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma.
    Cocconi G; Di Blasio B; Boni C; Bisagni G; Ceci G; Rondini E; Bella M; Leonardi F; Savoldi L; Camisa R; Bruzzi P
    Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 12124820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma: a well tolerated adjuvant regimen.
    Isaac N; Panzarella T; Lau A; Mayers C; Kirkbride P; Tannock IF; Vallis KA
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(4):696-703. PubMed ID: 12209711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new six-drug antiblastic regimen (R 14) at low doses (micropolychemotherapy) compared to CMF in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: phase III study.
    Pannuti F; Iafelice G; Martoni A; Fruet F; Angelelli B; Casadei M
    Chemioterapia; 1984 Aug; 3(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 6398121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intensive chemotherapy for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide and peplomycin with granulocyte granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Chemotherapy Committee, The Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1995 Oct; 25(5):203-7. PubMed ID: 7474408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.