BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7505351)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily amlodipine versus nitrendipine with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension.
    Coca A; Picado MJ; De la Sierra A; Aguilera MT; Sánchez M; Lluch MM; Urbano-Márquez A
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 7505351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.
    Miranda RD; Mion D; Rocha JC; Kohlmann O; Gomes MA; Saraiva JF; Amodeo C; Filho BL
    Clin Ther; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1618-28. PubMed ID: 18840367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.
    Palatini P; Dorigatti F; Mugellini A; Spagnuolo V; Varì N; Ferrara R; Bertocchi F
    Clin Ther; 2004 Sep; 26(9):1436-45. PubMed ID: 15531006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of combination olmesartan medoxomil plus azelnidipine versus monotherapy with either agent on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and pulse rate in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: additional results from the REZALT study.
    Shimada K; Ogihara T; Saruta T; Kuramoto K;
    Clin Ther; 2010 May; 32(5):861-81. PubMed ID: 20685495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential time effect profiles of amlodipine, as compared to valsartan, revealed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, self blood pressure measurements and dose omission protocol.
    Radauceanu A; Boivin JM; Bernaud C; Fay R; Zannad F;
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 18(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 15312156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension not at goal with mono, dual or triple drug therapy: results of the CHAMPiOn study.
    Punzi HA
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Feb; 8(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24492985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicentre, 12-week study of imidapril and candesartan cilexetil in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    Palma-Gamiz JL; Pêgo M; Marquez E; Pujol M; Olivan J; Alegría E; Sagastagoitia-Gorostiza JD; Gonzalez-Juanatey JR
    Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(6):407-17. PubMed ID: 17506591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicenter, 14-week study of telmisartan and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    Lacourcière Y; Neutel JM; Davidai G; Koval S
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jan; 19(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 16461201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambulatory blood pressure response to once-daily fimasartan: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, parallel-group study in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Lee H; Kim KS; Chae SC; Jeong MH; Kim DS; Oh BH
    Clin Ther; 2013 Sep; 35(9):1337-49. PubMed ID: 23932463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An open, parallel, comparative evaluation of amlodipine and nitrendipine in the monotherapeutic treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension.
    Englert R; Beressem P; von Manteuffel E; Stafunsky S; Kramar M
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1991; 17 Suppl 1():S22-4. PubMed ID: 16296702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.
    de la Sierra A; Gil-Extremera B; Calvo C; Campo C; García-Puig J; Márquez E; Oliván J; Roca Cusachs A; Sanz de Castro S; Pontes C; Delgadillo J
    J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Mar; 18(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 14973517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of benazepril monotherapy to amlodipine plus benazepril in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate hypertension: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study].
    Fan CM; Yan LR; Tao YK; Wang L; Li YQ; Gao MM; Wang YN; Li CX; Wang XW; Lu XL; Pang HM; Li YS
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 39(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 21418799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
    Mourad JJ; Amodeo C; de Champvallins M; Brzozowska-Villatte R; Asmar R;
    J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 35(7):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 28306636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.
    Lee HY; Kang HJ; Koo BK; Oh BH; Heung-Sun K; Kim KS; Seo HS; Ro YM; Kang JH; Woong CJ; Joo SJ; Kim MH; Joon-Han S; Yoon J; Park SH; Jin-Ok J; Ju AK; Chong-Yun R; Yeon KJ; Park KM; Lim DK; Park SY;
    Clin Ther; 2005 Jun; 27(6):728-39. PubMed ID: 16117979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension.
    Chrysant SG; Marbury TC; Robinson TD
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 12764406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixed combination of benazepril and low-dose amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    Fogari R; Zoppi A; Lusardi P; Mugellini A; Preti P; Motolese M
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1997 Aug; 30(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 9269944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized, comparative, double-blind study of amlodipine vs. nicardipine as a treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.
    Mounier-Véhier C; Jaboureck O; Emeriau JP; Bernaud C; Clerson P; Carre A
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2002 Dec; 16(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 12685513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide compared with benazepril and amlodipine besylate.
    Kereiakes DJ; Neutel JM; Punzi HA; Xu J; Lipka LJ; Dubiel R
    Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2007; 7(5):361-72. PubMed ID: 17953475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Philipp T; Smith TR; Glazer R; Wernsing M; Yen J; Jin J; Schneider H; Pospiech R
    Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):563-80. PubMed ID: 17617280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and safety of fosinopril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations on ambulatory blood pressure profiles in hypertension. Fosinopril/Hydrochlorothiazide Investigators.
    Guthrie R; Reggi DR; Plesher MM; Saini RK; Battikha JP
    Am J Hypertens; 1996 Apr; 9(4 Pt 1):306-11. PubMed ID: 8722432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.