619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7508544)
1. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The subtlety of alkylating agents in reactions with biological macromolecules.
Vogel EW; Nivard MJ
Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 7508544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA damage and repair in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis: implications of structure-activity relationships for cross-species extrapolation.
Vogel EW; Nivard MJ; Ballering LA; Bartsch H; Barbin A; Nair J; Comendador MA; Sierra LM; Aguirrezabalaga I; Tosal L; Ehrenberg L; Fuchs RP; Janel-Bintz R; Maenhaut-Michel G; Montesano R; Hall J; Kang H; Miele M; Thomale J; Bender K; Engelbergs J; Rajewsky MF
Mutat Res; 1996 Jun; 353(1-2):177-218. PubMed ID: 8692191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA damage and repair in somatic and germ cells in vivo.
Vogel EW; Natarajan AT
Mutat Res; 1995 Aug; 330(1-2):183-208. PubMed ID: 7623865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nucleophilic selectivity of alkylating agents and their hypermutability in Drosophila as predictors of carcinogenic potency in rodents.
Vogel EW; Barbin A; Nivard MJ; Bartsch H
Carcinogenesis; 1990 Dec; 11(12):2211-7. PubMed ID: 2265471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nucleophilic selectivity as a determinant of carcinogenic potency (TD50) in rodents: a comparison of mono- and bi-functional alkylating agents and vinyl chloride metabolites.
Barbin A; Bartsch H
Mutat Res; 1989 Nov; 215(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 2811916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Germ cell mutagenesis in Drosophila: multiple endpoint analysis.
Nivard MJ; Wijen J; Vogel EW
Acta Biochim Pol; 1998; 45(2):545-59. PubMed ID: 9821883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic method for pre-classification of genotoxins into monofunctional or cross-linking agents.
Vogel EW; Zijlstra JA; Nivard MJ
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1993; 21(4):319-31. PubMed ID: 8491211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heritable and cancer risks of exposures to anticancer drugs: inter-species comparisons of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid-binding agents.
Vogel EW; Barbin A; Nivard MJ; Stack HF; Waters MD; Lohman PH
Mutat Res; 1998 May; 400(1-2):509-40. PubMed ID: 9685708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between reaction kinetics and mutagenic action of monofunctional alkylating agents in higher eukaryotic systems. IV. The effects of the excision-defective mei-9L1 and mus(2)201D1 mutants on alkylation-induced genetic damage in Drosophila.
Vogel EW; Dusenbery RL; Smith PD
Mutat Res; 1985 Apr; 149(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 3920517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative comparisons between carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and electrophilicity of direct-acting N-nitroso compounds and other alkylating agents.
Bartsch H; Malaveille C; Tomatis L; Brun G; Dodet B; Terracini B
IARC Sci Publ; 1982; (41):525-32. PubMed ID: 6754595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for genotoxicity using the DRAG assay: investigation of halogenated environmental contaminants.
Johansson F; Allkvist A; Erixon K; Malmvärn A; Nilsson R; Bergman A; Helleday T; Jenssen D
Mutat Res; 2004 Sep; 563(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 15324747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinogenic potency in rodents versus genotoxic potency in E. coli: a correlation analysis for bifunctional alkylating agents.
Quinto I; Radman M
Mutat Res; 1987 Dec; 181(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 3317026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The in vivo genetic activity profile of the monofunctional nitrogen mustard 2-chloroethylamine differs drastically from its bifunctional counterpart mechlorethamine.
Wijen JP; Nivard MJ; Vogel EW
Carcinogenesis; 2000 Oct; 21(10):1859-67. PubMed ID: 11023544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nucleophilic selectivity of carcinogens as a determinant of enhanced mutational response in excision repair-defective strains in Drosophila: effects of 30 carcinogens.
Vogel EW
Carcinogenesis; 1989 Nov; 10(11):2093-106. PubMed ID: 2509091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Two million rodent carcinogens? The role of SAR and QSAR in their detection.
Ashby J
Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 7508545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the DNA-repair host-mediated assay. I. Induction of repairable DNA damage in E. coli cells recovered from liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and the blood stream of mice treated with methylating carcinogens.
Kerklaan PR; Bouter S; van Elburg PA; Mohn GR
Mutat Res; 1985; 148(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 3881659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genotoxic potency of monofunctional alkylating agents in E. coli: comparison with carcinogenic potency in rodents.
Quinto I; Tenenbaum L; Radman M
Mutat Res; 1990 Feb; 228(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 2405262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative comparison of carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and electrophilicity of 10 direct-acting alkylating agents and of the initial O6:7-alkylguanine ratio in DNA with carcinogenic potency in rodents.
Bartsch H; Terracini B; Malaveille C; Tomatis L; Wahrendorf J; Brun G; Dodet B
Mutat Res; 1983 Aug; 110(2):181-219. PubMed ID: 6348521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the role of alkylating mechanisms, O-alkylation and DNA-repair in genotoxicity and mutagenicity of alkylating methanesulfonates of widely varying structures in bacterial systems.
Eder E; Kütt W; Deininger C
Chem Biol Interact; 2001 Jul; 137(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 11518566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
