These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 750914)

  • 21. Assessment of mentally retarded children with the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children.
    Naglieri JA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Jan; 89(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 3976736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Large state-level fluctuations in mental retardation classifications related to introduction of renormed intelligence test.
    Scullin MH
    Am J Ment Retard; 2006 Sep; 111(5):322-35. PubMed ID: 16968141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity of caregiver information on the developmental status of severely brain-damaged young children.
    Stancin T; Reuter J; Dunn V; Bickett L
    Am J Ment Defic; 1984 Jan; 88(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 6695960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Mental efficiency of the progeny of men with epilepsy].
    Pierzchała K; Kłosińska E
    Psychiatr Pol; 1991; 25(5):32-7. PubMed ID: 1821990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting IQ change in preschoolers with developmental delays.
    Field M; Fox N; Radcliffe J
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1990 Aug; 11(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 1698822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vision screening of individuals with severe or profound mental retardation.
    O'Dell CD; Harshaw K; Boothe RG
    Ment Retard; 1993 Jun; 31(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 8326875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two sets of Piagetian scales with severely and profoundly retarded children.
    Silverstein AB; Brownlee L; Hubbell M; McLain RE
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Nov; 80(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 1190269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2) in 12-month-old infants.
    Connolly BH; Dalton L; Smith JB; Lamberth NG; McCay B; Murphy W
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2006; 18(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 16912639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of WAIS and WAIS-R scores of mildly and moderately mentally retarded adults.
    Simon CL; Clopton JR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1984 Nov; 89(3):301-3. PubMed ID: 6517112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the intellectural consequences of early intervention with high-risk infants.
    Ramey CT; Smith BJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Jan; 81(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 836631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurement of personal competence of mentally retarded individuals.
    Reynolds WM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1981 Jan; 85(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 7457501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical variables at age 2 predictive of mental retardation at age 5 in children with pervasive developmental disorder.
    Takeda T; Koyama T; Kanai C; Kurita H
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 59(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 16401249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intellectual and adaptive functioning: some tables for interpreting the Vineland in combination with intelligence tests.
    Atkinson L
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 2223027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The predictive validity of the Cattell infant intelligence scale for young mentally retarded children.
    Erickson MT
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Mar; 72(5):728-33. PubMed ID: 5646274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Utility of the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development in cognitive assessment of children with pervasive developmental disorders.
    Koyama T; Osada H; Tsujii H; Kurita H
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 63(2):241-3. PubMed ID: 19335396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Diagnosis of inferior intellectual ability. Study of the reliability of test findings].
    Büttner M
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1984; 33(4):123-33. PubMed ID: 6473305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Structure of the Minnesota Developmental Programming System Behavioral Scales, Alternate Form C.
    Silverman WP; Silver EJ; Lubin RA; Sersen EA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Sep; 88(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 6638078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Developmental outcome of drug-exposed children through 30 months: a comparison of Bayley and Bayley-II.
    Schuler ME; Nair P; Harrington D
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):435-8. PubMed ID: 14593844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concurrent validity of the adaptive behavior scale as assessed by the Vineland Social Maturity Scale.
    Roszkowski MJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 Jul; 85(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 7446575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the validity of direct pediatric developmental evaluation versus developmental screening by parent report.
    Voigt RG; Llorente AM; Jensen CL; Fraley JK; Barbaresi WJ; Heird WC
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2007 Jul; 46(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 17579105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.