These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 750984)

  • 1. The effect of set on categorization in visual search.
    Gleitman H; Jonides J
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Oct; 24(4):361-81. PubMed ID: 750984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of task, selection set, and dispersion of attention on visual identification time.
    Schioldborg P; Paus E; Myhre G
    Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 4759282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Converging evidence for automatic perceptual processing in visual search.
    Logan GD
    Can J Psychol; 1976 Dec; 30(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 1016917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Specific and general set in tachistoscopic perception of alphanumeric characters.
    Riley TM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 4415853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An observation on set and visual comparison processes.
    Fox J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 May; 29(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 877219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The organization of component decisions in visual search.
    Lehtiö PK
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1970; 33():93-105. PubMed ID: 5445973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative set effects in character classification: a response-retrieval view of reaction time.
    Marcel AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Feb; 29(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 860005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The popout in some conjunction searches is due to perceptual grouping.
    Hegdé J; Felleman DJ
    Neuroreport; 1999 Jan; 10(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 10094151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the role of vertical symmetry in letter matching.
    Egeth HE; Brownell HH; Geoffrion LD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Aug; 2(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 993747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli.
    Ashby FG; Boynton G; Lee WW
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jan; 55(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 8036090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice reaction time: the location of auditory and visual similarity.
    Clement DE; Hawkins HL; Hosking KE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 4742383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic effects in visual word detection with visual similarity controlled.
    Henderson L; Chard J
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Apr; 23(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 748851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual search in monkeys.
    Latto R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Feb; 32(1):307-12. PubMed ID: 4994048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of stimulus discriminability on psychological refractory period effect.
    Tolkmitt FJ; O'Connor GP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Oct; 33(2):571-4. PubMed ID: 5124115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in processing visual patterns.
    Bradshaw JL; Gates A; Patterson K
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Nov; 28(4):667-81. PubMed ID: 1013284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory pretraining as a determinant of visual thresholds for pseudowords.
    Richards LG; Hempstead JD
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 86(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 4775380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study of latent periods of visual object differentiation using various significant characteristics].
    Zaĭtsev AV; Lupandin VI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(4):38-42. PubMed ID: 11004748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of artificial pupil size on recognition threshold.
    Stelmack RM; Leckett WJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Oct; 39(2):739-42. PubMed ID: 4453489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holistic vs. attribute repetition effects in classifying stimuli.
    Lockhead GR; Gruenewald P; King M
    Mem Cognit; 1978 Jul; 6(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 692368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.