These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7511512)

  • 1. Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential.
    Falkenstein M; Hohnsbein J; Hoormann J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Mar; 92(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 7511512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Late visual and auditory ERP components and choice reaction time.
    Falkenstein M; Hohnsbein J; Hoormann J
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Jul; 35(3):201-24. PubMed ID: 8218614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of attention and time-pressure on P300 subcomponents and implications for mental workload research.
    Hohnsbein J; Falkenstein M; Hoormann J
    Biol Psychol; 1995 May; 40(1-2):73-81. PubMed ID: 7647187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks.
    Falkenstein M; Koshlykova NA; Kiroj VN; Hoormann J; Hohnsbein J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Jan; 96(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 7530187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. I. Simple and choice reaction tasks.
    Hohnsbein J; Falkenstein M; Hoormann J; Blanke L
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Jun; 78(6):438-46. PubMed ID: 1712279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality.
    Mertens R; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 9402891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 1374703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mismatch negativity (MMN) for sequences of auditory and visual stimuli: evidence for a mechanism specific to the auditory modality.
    Nyman G; Alho K; Laurinen P; Paavilainen P; Radil T; Reinikainen K; Sams M; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 1701706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets.
    Mazaheri A; Picton TW
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 15922161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials to visual, auditory, and bimodal (combined auditory-visual) stimuli.
    Isoğlu-Alkaç U; Kedzior K; Keskindemirci G; Ermutlu N; Karamursel S
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 117(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 17365112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of visual and auditory stimuli on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in man.
    Okajima Y; Chino N; Takahashi M; Kimura A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995; 35(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 7555931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of auditory, visual and olfactory event-related potentials for comparing interspersed- and single-stimulus paradigms.
    Nordin S; Andersson L; Olofsson JK; McCormack M; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):252-62. PubMed ID: 21756945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Boll S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19386054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modality shift effects mimic multisensory interactions: an event-related potential study.
    Gondan M; Vorberg D; Greenlee MW
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 182(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 17562033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.