These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7513851)

  • 1. DDI pacing: indications, expectations, and follow-up.
    Irwin M; Harris L; Cameron D; Louis C; Radvanszky E; Goldman B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Mar; 17(3 Pt 1):274-9. PubMed ID: 7513851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
    Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities.
    Irwin M; Carbol B; Senaratne M; Gulamhusein S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. PubMed ID: 8945043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
    Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature.
    Sutton R; Bourgeois I
    Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
    Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
    Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up.
    Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
    Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
    Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
    Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Programming a long paced atrioventricular interval may be risky in DDDR pacing.
    Pieterse MG; den Dulk K; van Gelder BM; van Mechelen R; Wellens HJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 7513413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stability of AV conduction in sick sinus node syndrome patients with implanted atrial pacemakers.
    Hayes DL; Furman S
    Am Heart J; 1984 Apr; 107(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 6702557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia].
    Drogaĭtsev AD
    Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
    Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AAIsafeR limits ventricular pacing in unselected patients.
    Pioger G; Leny G; Nitzsché R; Ripart A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 17302721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical remodeling of the atria following loss of atrioventricular synchrony: a long-term study in humans.
    Sparks PB; Mond HG; Vohra JK; Jayaprakash S; Kalman JM
    Circulation; 1999 Nov; 100(18):1894-900. PubMed ID: 10545434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival of DDD pacing mode after atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing for refractory atrial fibrillation.
    Wood MA; Curtis AB; Takle-Newhouse TA; Ellenbogen KA
    Am Heart J; 1999 Apr; 137(4 Pt 1):682-5. PubMed ID: 10097230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AAI pacing mode: when is it indicated and how should it be achieved?
    Katritsis D; Camm AJ
    Clin Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 8458114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
    Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.