207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7514472)
21. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].
Halachmi S; Goldin O; Gleizarov E; Kaufman Z; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S
Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):605-8, 680, 679. PubMed ID: 16218527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy.
Aynehchi S; Samadi AA; Gallo SJ; Konno S; Tazaki H; Eshghi M
J Endourol; 2002 Aug; 16(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 12227908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones.
Riehle RA
Semin Urol; 1986 Aug; 4(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 3749657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: investigation of factors influencing stone fragmentation and appropriate number of sessions for changing treatment modality.
Kim HH; Lee JH; Park MS; Lee SE; Kim SW
J Endourol; 1996 Dec; 10(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 8972781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ureteral stone manipulation before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Evans RJ; Wingfield DD; Morollo BA; Jenkins AD
J Urol; 1988 Jan; 139(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 3336100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-efficacy comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic laser lithotripsy in distal ureteral stones.
Francesca F; Grasso M; Lucchelli M; Broglia L; Cammelli L; Zoppei G; Rigatti P
J Endourol; 1993 Aug; 7(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 8252020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nonstent or noncatheter extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.
Cass AS
Urology; 1994 Feb; 43(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 8116112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Second in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in not disintegrated ureteral stones is preferred to retrograde manipulation.
Planz B; Borchers H; Mattelaer P; Jakse G
Urol Int; 1995; 55(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 7571176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of success rates and financial cost of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in situ and after manipulation for proximal ureteral stones.
Varkarakis J; Protogerou V; Albanis S; Sofras F; Deliveliotis C
Urol Res; 2003 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 12827327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of ureteroscopy to in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi.
Turk TM; Jenkins AD
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):45-6; discussion 46-7. PubMed ID: 10037364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Management of ureteral stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. 3 years of experience.
Recker F; Jaeger P; Alund G; Konstantinidis K; Knoenagel H; Hauri D
Urol Int; 1989; 44(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 2800056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.
Chang CP; Huang SH; Tai HL; Wang BF; Yen MY; Huang KH; Jiang HJ; Lin J
J Endourol; 2001 Aug; 15(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 11552776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in elderly male patients.
Halachmi S; Meretyk S
Aging Male; 2006 Sep; 9(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17020872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones.
Kamel M; Salem EA; Maarouf A; Abdalla M; Ragab A; Shahin AM
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 25440820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors associated with failure of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones using Dornier lithotripter U/50.
Shiroyanagi Y; Yagisawa T; Nanri M; Kobayashi C; Toma H
Int J Urol; 2002 Jun; 9(6):304-7. PubMed ID: 12110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. SWL: our twenty-four year experience.
Zanetti G; Trinchieri A; Montanari E; Rocco F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2008 Mar; 80(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18533621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Management of the impacted ureteral calculus.
Morgentaler A; Bridge SS; Dretler SP
J Urol; 1990 Feb; 143(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 1967657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructed proximal ureteral stones. A prospective randomized study comparing in situ, stent bypass and below stone catheter with irrigation strategies.
Chang SC; Kuo HC; Hsu T
Eur Urol; 1993; 24(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 8375437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
