These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7516543)

  • 1. Automated precision current delivery: an alternative method for cardiac defibrillation.
    Zimmerman D; Farkhani F; Wesley RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):595-602. PubMed ID: 7516543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of transthoracic impedance and peak current flow on defibrillation success in a prehospital setting.
    Heavens JP; Cleland MJ; Maloney JP; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Aug; 32(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 9701302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design for a constant peak current defibrillator.
    Machin JW; Brownhill J; Furness A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 2394461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impedance to defibrillation countershock: does an optimal impedance exist?
    KenKnight BH; Eyüboğlu BM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2068-87. PubMed ID: 8552522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvenous catheter defibrillation: comparison of a half-sinusoidal and trapezoidal waveform.
    Thomas E; Ewy GA; Taren D
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(6):349-51. PubMed ID: 745574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Schoenlein W; Minton M; Grubbs S; Wilcox P
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 1272091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Electrical defibrillation and cardioversion].
    Brazdzionyte J; Stanaitiene G; Ablonskyte-Dūdoniene R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(10):892-9. PubMed ID: 16272838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of biphasic waveform pulse on endocardial defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Neuzner J; Pitschner HF; Huth C; Schlepper M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 7513406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current and energy in external cardiac defibrillation.
    Watson AB; Ellis MS
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Dec; 17(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7872902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
    Li Y; Ristagno G; Yu T; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibrated current divider network for precision current delivery during high-voltage transthoracic defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1970-3. PubMed ID: 16285402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms delivered from various capacitances/pulse widths.
    Lin JH; Stotts LJ; Rosborough JP; Frederick H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9121981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of the optimum bidirectional (+/- biphasic) wave for defibrillation.
    Geddes LA; Havel W
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 10690435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External defibrillation: the need for uniformity in analyzing and reporting results.
    White RD
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Aug; 32(2):234-6. PubMed ID: 9701307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining transthoracic impedance, delivered energy, and peak current during defibrillation episodes.
    Jones VC; Charbonnier FM; Long P
    Med Instrum; 1981; 15(6):380-2. PubMed ID: 7339468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved electrodes for electrical defibrillation of rats.
    Ordodi VL; Paunescu V; Mischie S; Ignea A; Toma O; Ionac M; Mic AA; Sandesc D; Mic FA
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 45(6):54-7. PubMed ID: 17089993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of cardiac defibrillation by three-dimensional finite element modeling of the human thorax.
    Panescu D; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ; Stratbucker RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Feb; 42(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 7868146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defibrillation: ensuring its success.
    Health Devices; 1990 Feb; 19(2):32-56. PubMed ID: 2372318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.