281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7517815)
1. Practical aspects of fixatives in high resolution nuclear image analysis.
Makkus AC; van 't Hof-Grootenboer AE; Pahlplatz MM; de Wilde PC; Gemmink AJ; Cuypers VM; Vooijs GP
Cytometry; 1994 Apr; 15(4):302-10. PubMed ID: 7517815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modification of tumor ploidy level via the choice of tissue taken as diploid reference in the digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei.
Kiss R; Gasperin P; Verhest A; Pasteels JL
Mod Pathol; 1992 Nov; 5(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 1285444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Invariance of textural features in image cytometry under variation of size and pixel magnitude.
Rodenacker K
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Mar; 8(2):117-33. PubMed ID: 7540417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Papanicolaou and Feulgen staining methods for DNA quantification by image analysis.
Gurley AM; Hidvegi DF; Bacus JW; Bacus SS
Cytometry; 1990; 11(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 1693113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of fixation to the degradation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in different tissues.
Miething F; Hering S; Hanschke B; Dressler J
J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Mar; 54(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 16260588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of embedding methods versus fixative type on karyometric measures.
Boon ME; van der Poel HG; Tan CJ; Kok LP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1994 Apr; 16(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 8043160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Papanicolaou staining and Feulgen staining for automated prescreening.
Soost HJ; Brem W; Höbel W; Otto K; Schwarz G
Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 6189437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological considerations on Feulgen-staining applied to cells in primoculture: the model of osteoarthritic synovial cells.
Giroud F; Delage B; Monet JD; Chancel G; Cals MJ; Ekindjian OG
Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Jun; 11(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8844101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of fixatives on calf thymocytes chromatin as analyzed by 3D high-resolution fluorescence microscopy.
Mascetti G; Vergani L; Diaspro A; Carrara S; Radicchi G; Nicolini C
Cytometry; 1996 Feb; 23(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 8742169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative nuclear morphometry, Markovian texture descriptors, and DNA content captured on a CAS-200 Image analysis system, combined with PCNA and HER-2/neu immunohistochemistry for prediction of prostate cancer progression.
Veltri RW; Partin AW; Epstein JE; Marley GM; Miller CM; Singer DS; Patton KP; Criley SR; Coffey DS
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1994; 19():249-58. PubMed ID: 7529856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Hyperdiploidy" in the Purkinje neuron population: chromatin status or extra-DNA? The influence of fixatives on Feulgen-DNA.
Scherini E
Basic Appl Histochem; 1982; 26(3):173-83. PubMed ID: 6182875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative studies of Feulgen hydrolysis for DNA. I. Influence of different fixatives and polyethylene glycols.
Kotelnikov VM; Litinskaya LL
Histochemistry; 1981; 71(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 6164674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Karyo- and cytometric investigations of cortical layer V pyramidal neurons of albino rat after three various fixations].
Nicolai B
Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch; 1981; 95(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 7036556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Studies on oral tissue section sample preparation by the combination of fixation by Carnoy solution and decalcification by trichloroacetic acid.
Ogawa T; Okada Y; Mori M
J Osaka Dent Univ; 1979; 13(1-2):65-9. PubMed ID: 95597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intensity of the Feulgen reaction depending on the method and duration of fixation].
Karalova EM; Khachikian RE; Avetisian AS; Magakian IuA
Tsitologiia; 1980 Sep; 22(9):1046-53. PubMed ID: 6160662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immersion fixation with Carnoy solution for conventional immunohistochemical detection of particular N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits in murine hippocampus.
Yoneyama M; Kitayama T; Taniura H; Yoneda Y
J Neurosci Res; 2003 Aug; 73(3):416-26. PubMed ID: 12868075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell fixatives for immunostaining.
Jamur MC; Oliver C
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 588():55-61. PubMed ID: 20012819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized morphonuclear analyses of Feulgen-stained nuclei from 11 chemosensitive and from 11 chemoresistant neoplastic cell lines.
Pauwels O; Kiss R
Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Oct; 7(3):235-50. PubMed ID: 7531485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different cell extraction methods on cytometric features.
Thunnissen FB; Perdaen H; Forrest J
Cytometry; 1992; 13(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 1633727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three different methods for automated classification of cervical cells.
Palcic B; MacAulay C; Shlien S; Treurniet W; Tezcan H; Anderson G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Nov; 4(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 1280993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
