These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 752045)

  • 1. The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task.
    Simon JR; Pouraghabagher AR
    J Gerontol; 1978 Jul; 33(4):553-61. PubMed ID: 752045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing.
    Acosta E; Richard Simon J
    J Mot Behav; 1976 Sep; 8(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 23964573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation.
    Falkenstein M; Yordanova J; Kolev V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16257076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical configuration by stimulus onset visual evoked potentials (SO-VEPs) predicts performance on a motion direction discrimination task.
    Zalar B; Martin T; Kavcic V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 25889693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials.
    Yordanova J; Kolev V; Hohnsbein J; Falkenstein M
    Brain; 2004 Feb; 127(Pt 2):351-62. PubMed ID: 14607784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks.
    Kolev V; Falkenstein M; Yordanova J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1719-30. PubMed ID: 16246465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive interference and aging: insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task.
    Juncos-Rabadán O; Pereiro AX; Facal D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17601480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Level of uncertainty and brain damage: a reaction time test of attention for clinical use.
    Wyns C; Bruyer R
    Int J Neurosci; 1988 Jun; 40(3-4):153-65. PubMed ID: 3403167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organization of sensory discrimination and response selection in choice and nonchoice conditions: a study using cerebral evoked potentials in normal humans.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Shefrin SL
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Oct; 64(4):1270-81. PubMed ID: 2258747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans.
    Ortiz TA; Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1499-512. PubMed ID: 8509828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task.
    Kubo-Kawai N; Kawai N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):452-64. PubMed ID: 19575334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.