These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 752045)

  • 21. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus.
    Proctor RW; Pick DF; Vu KP; Anderson RE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 May; 119(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 15823241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic cue selection and discrimination under degradation: differential contributions of the inferior parietal and posterior temporal cortices.
    Scharinger M; Henry MJ; Obleser J
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():373-81. PubMed ID: 25481793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A violation of pure insertion: mental rotation and choice reaction time.
    Ilan AB; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Jun; 20(3):520-36. PubMed ID: 8027713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching.
    West R; Travers S
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 18403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age-related impairment on a forced-choice version of the Mnemonic Similarity Task.
    Huffman DJ; Stark CE
    Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 131(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 28004951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stimulus-response correspondence effect as a function of temporal overlap between relevant and irrelevant information processing.
    Wang DY; Richard FD; Ray B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1648-56. PubMed ID: 26555858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An additive factor analysis of the effect of sub-anaesthetic doses of nitrous oxide on information processing: evidence for an impairment of the motor adjustment stage.
    Courtière A; Hardouin J; Vidal F; Possamaï CA; Hasbroucq T
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Feb; 165(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 12451439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of severe closed-head injury on three stages of information processing.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe ME; Marks W; Fahy JF; Long CJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1992 Sep; 14(5):717-37. PubMed ID: 1474141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anticipation of visual form independent of knowing where the form will occur.
    Bruhn P; Bundesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):930-41. PubMed ID: 22528609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus preprocessing and response selection in depression: a reaction time study.
    Azorin JM; Benhaïm P; Hasbroucq T; Possamaï CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Jul; 89(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 7645412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 20178922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effect of age on the orientation of attention: effect of changing the interval between signal and stimulus].
    Mucignat C; Castiello U; Umilta C; Tradardi V
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1991 May; 67(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 1805884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms.
    Jiang Y; Kanwisher N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1080-94. PubMed ID: 14709228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults.
    Fuhrman SI; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Vestib Res; 2015; 25(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 26410669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preparatory state and postural adjustment strategies for choice reaction step initiation.
    Watanabe T; Ishida K; Tanabe S; Nojima I
    Neuroscience; 2016 Sep; 332():140-8. PubMed ID: 27393247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.