236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7521954)
1. Evaluation of distraction osteogenesis by scanning electron microscopy.
Ganey TM; Klotch DW; Slater-Haase AS; Sasse J
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Sep; 111(3 Pt 1):265-72. PubMed ID: 7521954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microstructural investigations of strain-related collagen mineralization.
Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Meyer T; Schulze-Osthoff D; Jäsche J; Kruse-Lösler B; Joos U
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 39(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 11601821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental studies on the effect of osteotomy technique on the bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis.
Krawczyk A; Kuropka P; Kuryszko J; Wall A; Dragan S; Kulej M
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 17140872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Basement membrane of blood vessels during distraction osteogenesis.
Ganey TM; Klotch DW; Sasse J; Ogden JA; Garcia T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Apr; (301):132-8. PubMed ID: 7512453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of bone formation during osteoneogenesis: a canine model.
Klotch DW; Ganey TM; Slater-Haase A; Sasse J
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Feb; 112(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 7530832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy.
Hu J; Li J; Wang D; Buckley MJ; Agarwal S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 12102418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) on the regenerate bone in distraction osteogenesis.
Ozkan K; Eralp L; Kocaoglu M; Ahishali B; Bilgic B; Mutlu Z; Turker M; Ozkan FU; Sahin K; Guven M
Growth Factors; 2007 Apr; 25(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17891595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unexpected absence of effect of rhBMP-7 on distraction osteogenesis.
Sailhan F; Chotel F; Chousta A; Viguier E; Boivin G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():227-34. PubMed ID: 17159580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ultrastructural and Ca/P changes of the regenerated bone after mandibular distraction in goats].
Hu J; Li J; Wang D; Liao Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Feb; 19(1):9-10, 31. PubMed ID: 12539625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Segmental mandibular reconstruction by elasticity distraction osteogenesis associated with guided bone regeneration].
Zhou HZ; Hu M; Liu HC; Yao J; Ma L
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 16329831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distraction bone healing.
Karaharju EO; Aalto K; Kahri A; Lindberg LA; Kallio T; Karaharju-Suvanto T; Vauhkonen M; Peltonen J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):38-43. PubMed ID: 8242947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of chitosan bead encapsulating calcium sulfate as an injectable bone substitute on consolidation in the mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model.
Cho BC; Chung HY; Lee DG; Yang JD; Park JW; Roh KH; Kim GU; Lee DS; Kwon IC; Bae EH; Jang KH; Park RW; Kim IS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1753-64. PubMed ID: 16297697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques.
Nooh N; Abdullah WA; El-Awady Grawish M; Ramalingam S; Hassan G; Javed F; Al-Hezaimi K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23810515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Analysis of New Bone Obtained by Nonvascular Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Canines.
Guo P; Zhou N; Lu X; Huang XP; Jiang XF; Wang Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 74(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 26044605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Ozeç Y; Oztürk M; Kýlýç E; Yeler H; Göze F; Gümüş C
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 16432412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of oil-based calcium hydroxide (Osteoinductal) on distraction osteogenesis in rabbit mandible.
Polat HB; Yeler H; Gumus C; Bulut HE; Kucuk D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):e30-6. PubMed ID: 19464640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonvascular transport distraction osteogenesis in bone formation and regeneration. Is it an accidental phenomenon?
Guo P; Zeng JJ; Zhou N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25457741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis. Long-term results.
Costantino PD; Friedman CD; Shindo ML; Houston G; Sisson GA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 May; 119(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 8484939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
