293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7524306)
1. Grading prostate cancer.
Bostwick DG
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4 Suppl 1):S38-56. PubMed ID: 7524306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Li YP; Lubeck DP; Flanders SC; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 11176485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathology of localized prostate cancer. Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Prognostic Parameters in Localized Prostate Cancer. Stockholm, Sweden, May 12-13, 1993.
Murphy GP; Busch C; Abrahamsson PA; Epstein JI; McNeal JE; Miller GJ; Mostofi FK; Nagle RB; Nordling S; Parkinson C
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1994; 162():7-42; discussion 115-27. PubMed ID: 7817162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Arora R; Koch MO; Eble JN; Ulbright TM; Li L; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2362-6. PubMed ID: 15160339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of small amounts of cancer in prostate biopsies to reveal pathologic grade.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Brooks JD; Srinivas S; Presti JC
Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1229-34. PubMed ID: 16765184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.
Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive and novel predictive modeling technique using detailed pathology factors in men with localized prostate carcinoma.
Potters L; Purrazzella R; Brustein S; Fearn P; Leibel SA; Kattan MW
Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(7):1451-6. PubMed ID: 12237913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
