These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7526913)

  • 1. [The testing of the carcinogenic potential of different chemical substances and radiations].
    Găldean D
    Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol; 1994; 39(1-2):6-27. PubMed ID: 7526913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Efficiency of the prediction of carcinogenic activities of chemical substances based on scoring somatic mutations in the soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill].
    Bittueva MM; Abilev SK; Tarasov VA
    Genetika; 2007 Jan; 43(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 17333942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutation research, genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.
    Martus HJ; Suter W
    Mutat Res; 2009 Jan; 672(2):135. PubMed ID: 19056513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of antihypertensive agents.
    Brambilla G; Martelli A
    Mutat Res; 2006 Mar; 612(2):115-49. PubMed ID: 16458045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The mutagenicity of animal carcinogenic agents of natural origin].
    Nersesian AK
    Eksp Onkol; 1990; 12(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 2226265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided analysis of mutagenicity and cell transformation data for assessing their relationship with carcinogenicity.
    Taningher M; Malacarne D; Perrotta A; Parodi S
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 33(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 10334625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medium-term bioassays in rats for rapid detection of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Shirai T; Hirose M; Ito N
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):251-72. PubMed ID: 10353390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
    O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 16386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of tests in yeasts and fungi in the detection and evaluation of carcinogens.
    Parry JM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):471-85. PubMed ID: 10353399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of quantum-chemical methods to prediction of the carcinogenicity of chemical substances].
    Zholdikova ZI; Kharchevnikova NV
    Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2006; (4):46-54. PubMed ID: 16889356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of potential biomarkers of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells by cDNA microarray analysis.
    Kim JY; Kwon J; Kim JE; Koh WS; Chung MK; Yoon S; Song CW; Lee M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005; 45(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 15612046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structure-activity relationship analysis tools: validation and applicability in predicting carcinogens.
    Mayer J; Cheeseman MA; Twaroski ML
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 18023949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carcinogenic chemical-response "fingerprint" for male F344 rats exposed to a series of 195 chemicals: implications for predicting carcinogens with transgenic models.
    Johnson FM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):234-45. PubMed ID: 10618171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative correlation of carcinogenic potency with four different classes of short-term test data.
    Travis CC; Wang LA; Waehner MJ
    Mutagenesis; 1991 Sep; 6(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 1795638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-mutagenic carcinogens are primarily hydrophobic.
    McCoy GD; Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Carcinogenesis; 1990 Jul; 11(7):1111-7. PubMed ID: 2372870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.