These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7529100)

  • 1. Palliative medicine overtakes euthanasia.
    Finlay IG
    Palliat Med; 1994 Oct; 8(4):271-2. PubMed ID: 7529100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Euthanasia in Britain.
    Kessel R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3):51. PubMed ID: 7544329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lords focus on medical ethics.
    Warden J
    BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6877):540-1. PubMed ID: 11643105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dilemmas of life and death: Part two.
    Walton
    J R Soc Med; 1995 Jul; 88(7):372-6. PubMed ID: 7562804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Their lordships on euthanasia.
    Lancet; 1994 Feb; 343(8895):430-1. PubMed ID: 7905948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. House of Lords on care for dying.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. United Kingdom Government publishes response to House of Lords report on medical ethics.
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):570-2. PubMed ID: 11657360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The House of Lords on issues of life and death.
    Walton J
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 7932320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A response to Logue's "Where hospice fails -- the limits of palliative care.
    Saunders C
    Omega (Westport); 1995-1996; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11658195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why the Lords rejected euthanasia.
    Fisher A
    Hum Life Rev; 1996; 22(3):15-22. PubMed ID: 11654616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Euthanasia.
    Smith AM; Twycross R; Madeley P; Gilbert J; Ventafridda V; Thomson HJ; Fergusson A; Saunders PJ; Finlay IG; Norris P; Ward B; Tate P
    BMJ; 1994 Aug; 309(6952):471-4. PubMed ID: 11654137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The euthanasia debate in Britain.
    Keown J
    J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 11655380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. House of Lords' response to end-of-life issues.
    Castledine G
    Br J Nurs; 1994 Apr 14-27; 3(7):359-60. PubMed ID: 8173296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lords' committee on medical ethics.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Apr; No. 87():3. PubMed ID: 11654063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A right to die? Some medico-legal reflection.
    Ognall H
    Med Leg J; 1994; 62(Pt. 4):165-79. PubMed ID: 11654337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Euphemisms for euthanasia.
    Sellman D
    Nurs Ethics; 1995 Dec; 2(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 8556388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Terminating treatment in Hungary Allocating death.
    Kovacs J; Evans D
    Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Oct; No. 72():13-20. PubMed ID: 11659452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services. Voluntary euthanasia: the council's view.
    Nurs Ethics; 1998 Jul; 5(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 9782922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia.
    Magnusson R
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1996 Dec; 20(4):1108-42. PubMed ID: 11657522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "No-sting" death: the final taboo.
    Marker RL
    Hum Life Rev; 1991; 17(4):7-29. PubMed ID: 11652622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.