These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7529444)

  • 1. Dyeing: a simple method for detecting positive or negative surgical margins.
    Noldus J; Huland H
    Urology; 1995 Jan; 45(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 7529444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of digital maps and sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Trpkov K; Warman L
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1751-2; author reply 1752. PubMed ID: 17149939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
    Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
    Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate sampling to predict radical prostatectomy outcome.
    Hollenbeck BK; Rubin MA
    Urology; 2001 Feb; 57(2):394-5. PubMed ID: 11246646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Touch preparation cytological evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Pearle MS; Oyasu R; Hidvegi D; Sutkowski D; Rademaker A; Cajulis R; Grayhack JT; McVary KT
    J Urol; 1994 Jul; 152(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 8201641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prostatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors.
    Shah R; Bassily N; Wei J; Mucci NR; Montie JE; Sanda MG; Rubin MA
    Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):721-5. PubMed ID: 11068287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Rosen MA; Goldstone L; Lapin S; Wheeler T; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 1992 Aug; 148(2 Pt 1):331-7. PubMed ID: 1635129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marking planes of surgical excision on breast biopsy specimens: use of artists' pigments suspended in acetone.
    Paterson DA; Davies JD
    J Clin Pathol; 1988 Sep; 41(9):1013-6. PubMed ID: 3056982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):1943-8; discussion 1948-9. PubMed ID: 11371886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Light Reflectance Spectroscopy to Detect Positive Surgical Margins on Prostate Cancer Specimens.
    Morgan MS; Lay AH; Wang X; Kapur P; Ozayar A; Sayah M; Zeng L; Liu H; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
    J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 26410735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection.
    Stamey TA; Villers AA; McNeal JE; Link PC; Freiha FS
    J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1166-72; discussion 1172-3. PubMed ID: 2342177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Epstein JI; Pizov G; Walsh PC
    Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3582-93. PubMed ID: 7683970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Gillitzer R; Thüroff C; Fandel T; Thomas C; Thüroff JW; Brenner W; Wiesner C; Jones J; Hansen T; Hampel C
    BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):755-759. PubMed ID: 20880193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence.
    Kernek KM; Koch MO; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 15976340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular determination of surgical margins using fossa biopsies at radical prostatectomy.
    Theodorescu D; Frierson HF; Sikes RA
    J Urol; 1999 May; 161(5):1442-8. PubMed ID: 10210369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors.
    Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathological definition and difficulties in assessing positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Montironi R; Cheng L; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 19007384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group.
    Alkhateeb S; Alibhai S; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Jewett M; Zlotta A; Nesbitt M; Lockwood G; Trachtenberg J
    J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 19913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.